drummerman1
100+ Head-Fier
There you go. A microscopic 'lille market research for the new Grell phone (and others).
The majority of serious headphone buffs (the ones that bother joining a forum to that effect, at least) would be willing to spend serious dosh on cans ... $1500+ which, I am sure we can all agree, is a lot even if it can get substantially more punishing.
However, most of those also have less expensive phones they also enjoy, some confirming that no headphone, regardless of cost, does it all. Indeed, one or two saying that if they only could keep one phone it may be one below the maximum choice+ here.
Now where does that leave the lowest tier? A little under represented is the answer. Whilst it is acknowledged that (for example) Drops 6XX is excellent value, choice of good headphones seems limited otherwise, with either sound or build (or both) taking a hit.
The 'middle' ground, let's (very broadly) just call it the $400 to $1500 region, is popular and, at approx 50% taken together (at point of this post), slightly exceeds that of the top tier at time I'm writing this, at least..
Packaging/Accessories, whilst mentioned a number of times don't seem to be too high on the priority list. It matters to some, less to others.
Does this tell us or manufacturers anything valuable? I doubt it . Nothing they/we don't already know or suspected as forum readers.
Still, it's fun and thanks for casting your votes.
Finally, if I were Grell (or others), I would make two products as a minimum, that makes sense. One statement HP over $1500 and an affordable version between $400 to $1500, again very broadly speaking, or around the $800 more specifically. Spend a little on packaging/accessories but don't go overboard.
On the other hand, one of the most sold (enthusiasts) headphones ever is Sennheisers 6 series which, even at full retail comes in at under $800 and the latest packaging is ... very basic, to be kind. Who can compete with the name, history and design though? Grell maybe?
Fun.
Keep voting.
The majority of serious headphone buffs (the ones that bother joining a forum to that effect, at least) would be willing to spend serious dosh on cans ... $1500+ which, I am sure we can all agree, is a lot even if it can get substantially more punishing.
However, most of those also have less expensive phones they also enjoy, some confirming that no headphone, regardless of cost, does it all. Indeed, one or two saying that if they only could keep one phone it may be one below the maximum choice+ here.
Now where does that leave the lowest tier? A little under represented is the answer. Whilst it is acknowledged that (for example) Drops 6XX is excellent value, choice of good headphones seems limited otherwise, with either sound or build (or both) taking a hit.
The 'middle' ground, let's (very broadly) just call it the $400 to $1500 region, is popular and, at approx 50% taken together (at point of this post), slightly exceeds that of the top tier at time I'm writing this, at least..
Packaging/Accessories, whilst mentioned a number of times don't seem to be too high on the priority list. It matters to some, less to others.
Does this tell us or manufacturers anything valuable? I doubt it . Nothing they/we don't already know or suspected as forum readers.
Still, it's fun and thanks for casting your votes.
Finally, if I were Grell (or others), I would make two products as a minimum, that makes sense. One statement HP over $1500 and an affordable version between $400 to $1500, again very broadly speaking, or around the $800 more specifically. Spend a little on packaging/accessories but don't go overboard.
On the other hand, one of the most sold (enthusiasts) headphones ever is Sennheisers 6 series which, even at full retail comes in at under $800 and the latest packaging is ... very basic, to be kind. Who can compete with the name, history and design though? Grell maybe?
Fun.
Keep voting.
Last edited: