shrimants
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Posts
- 1,176
- Likes
- 81
I am kind of stuck on this. One thing I've heard is that balanced audio doesnt make a difference in sound quality unless you run cables long distances.
Through my own research I know that with balanced audio, instead of having Left+ and Ground, you have Left+, Left-, and ground. obviously the other channel is there too but for simplicity sake we'll leave that out.
Left+ gets one signal, lets say sin(x). Left- gets the inverse of that signal, -sin(x). Here is where my confusion starts. In my head, this means that the two signals should completely cancel each other out, and that overall voltage potential difference between the leads of the driver should be 0. However, after doing some math, I realized that the voltage may actually be doubled.
Which one is true? Is the voltage doubled? Is that one of the reasons balanced "works better"? Doesnt that mean you put 2x the signal into the headphones, which should cause a gain of 2? Does this also double the current going in to the headphone?
Through my own research I know that with balanced audio, instead of having Left+ and Ground, you have Left+, Left-, and ground. obviously the other channel is there too but for simplicity sake we'll leave that out.
Left+ gets one signal, lets say sin(x). Left- gets the inverse of that signal, -sin(x). Here is where my confusion starts. In my head, this means that the two signals should completely cancel each other out, and that overall voltage potential difference between the leads of the driver should be 0. However, after doing some math, I realized that the voltage may actually be doubled.
Which one is true? Is the voltage doubled? Is that one of the reasons balanced "works better"? Doesnt that mean you put 2x the signal into the headphones, which should cause a gain of 2? Does this also double the current going in to the headphone?