How could this discovery affect headphone design?
Oct 4, 2004 at 5:06 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 9

Max Minimum

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Posts
782
Likes
17
Oct 4, 2004 at 8:22 PM Post #4 of 9
We've known that for years. To balance the input between them place a flat bladed screwdriver in your belly button and adjust accordingly!

Remove excess earwax first of course.
icon10.gif
 
Oct 5, 2004 at 12:02 AM Post #6 of 9
Actually, maybe the real question is, "How could this discovery affect production?". Maybe voice information (and possibly percussion?) would be easier to resolve if there were some (probably slight) level of bias to the right side while there was also some level of bias to the left for melodic instruments in the mix.
 
Oct 5, 2004 at 10:13 AM Post #8 of 9
Probably it will affect design of monoaural monitors. That is, right ear looks like the ear for which speech monitors (mono) should be designed for primarily.

But for stereo, I don't think there's necessarily a reason to do anything. That is, if one wants natural reproduction of sound.

After all, the natural acoustic environment doesn't in any way filter the sounds differently to the right or the left ear. In this regard both ears are on level and equal.

That is also the way our hearing is taught (the way it learns). Now, altering this natural balance by having different feed coming to left and right ear would probably sound unnatural, because it differs from natural stimuli.

However, as so often in sensory studies, nothing is for sure. It could just as well be that something comes out of this for stereo headphones as well. I'm guessing somebody will try to make hyper-realisting music/speec reproduction headphones, which while not being natural will provide enhanced accuracy of tonal and speech perception. Something for the accuracy freaks in all of us
smily_headphones1.gif


Thanks for the interesting article link, btw!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top