[NEO]

Actually it's made by Olympus. Special Edition about 200 units only.
Sorry but only available in Automatic (focus) only

 

[ayt999]

nice. how much does it go for?

 

[oneeyedhobbit]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayt999 nice. how much does it go for?

Probably too much.

Actually, I think it looks kind of plain, too. Save the packaging and ferrari logo. How does it perform as a camera?

 

[chiefroastbeef]

"hey sexie, so you drive a ferrawwri?"

"no, only this camera"

 

[ampgalore]

Looks like a Sony T1, although it's made by Olympus.

Small cameras like this can't take good pictures, especially in low light situations, because of the limitations of the small lens.

It's a cute camera that probably can perform adequately outdoors. But for indoor situations, it probably wouldn't be able to take decent pictures.

 

[adhoc]

Quote:

Originally Posted by oneeyedhobbit Probably too much.

agreed.

you should have seen the premium that oregon scientific was charging for the 'ferrari edition' over their (already quite overpriced imo) range of projecting clocks.

 

[NEO]

about $6-700 on eBay. That's expensive for 3.2 mp camera. But for 200 units made, it will be sold out soon. A years ago most 3.2 mps were about $500-$700 so I think it is not too bad. Would like to see the real camera but certainly wont find one at local Best Buy.

 

[Edwood]

That's a pretty ugly design there.

Nice finish and materials, but that camera looks like a toy disc camera from the 80's.

Of car design company related products, I've only liked F. A. Porsche studios products.

-Ed

 

[bhd812]

if its like the real cars of the company then its crap


still looks nice though

 

[redshifter]

where's the lens?

 

[GokieKS]

There are some things that the Ferrari red doesn't look good on, and a digital camera is another one.

For what I need in a digicam right now, I'm content with my DSC-T1. I'll move on to a DSLR when I actually have diposable income. ^^

~KS

 

[ayt999]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NEO about $6-700 on eBay. That's expensive for 3.2 mp camera. But for 200 units made, it will be sold out soon. A years ago most 3.2 mps were about $500-$700 so I think it is not too bad. Would like to see the real camera but certainly wont find one at local Best Buy.

I'll take it if it is only six dollars.

 

[jlo mein]

People will buy anything with a ferrari label on it...

At Winners (canadian tj maxx division), we had these butt ugly super bright red ferrari shoes for 50 bucks, and people still bought them.

 

[NEO]

I saw that shoes. Is it the one with Pininfarina design?

Actually, I think they did quite a good job on this Olympus Ferrari though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GokieKS There are some things that the Ferrari red doesn't look good on, and a digital camera is another one. For what I need in a digicam right now, I'm content with my DSC-T1. I'll move on to a DSLR when I actually have diposable income. ^^ ~KS

So how good is the picture quality of the T1? I am thinking maybe DSC-W1 is more interesting if you dont care about the real slim size. I heard that the T1 flash doesn't give enough exposure due to smaller capacity battery-How does your T1 perform in low light situation and how long does the battery last?

 

[ampgalore]

T1 doesn't perform well in low light situations.

I would get a V1 over a W1. V1 has a better lens.