Bilavideo
Caution: Incomplete trades.
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Posts
- 3,101
- Likes
- 128
Quote:
I don't know how much of it has to do with electronic crossover, but I think you're right about one thing: It's what they're doing with the drivers that is making the most difference. The CI is a popular driver for bass. The TWFK is becoming a popular dual. Before its prominence, the WBFK (which is one half of the TWFK) was the closest thing to a dedicated tweeter. Whether it's the caps, the filters or a combination of the two, it's probably what they're doing with the drivers - much more than the drivers - that is making the difference from one set of monitors to the next.
Whatever the case, I think it's time we took it to the next level. Being the little guy puts us at a capital disadvantage but our weakness is also our greatest virtue. A corporate product rollout is a very stiff thing. These guys have so much money dedicated to administrative costs, advertising, et cetera. They don't market what they can't mark-up. They build in vast quantities, according to regimented schedules, for a fixed release date. They don't like to update an existing product while they have stockpiles of it waiting to be sold to distributors. The need to maximize profitability is their bottleneck. A cottage-made IEM, made with quality materials, still has David's chance against Goliath.
Originally Posted by pdupiano /img/forum/go_quote.gif Come to think of it, I think the biggest part of making custom iems with cross overs may actually be the cross over moreso than which drivers you use. If you can find the right frequency cutoffs for each driver, and the right amount of cross over from one driver to the other, you may end up with the perfect mix. I can see that as being a major contributor to overall sound signature (not quality) and could potentially be the number one cost and differences say between the W3, UM3x, SE530, TFT Pro, etc... and of course the same should apply to even higher end iems. |
I don't know how much of it has to do with electronic crossover, but I think you're right about one thing: It's what they're doing with the drivers that is making the most difference. The CI is a popular driver for bass. The TWFK is becoming a popular dual. Before its prominence, the WBFK (which is one half of the TWFK) was the closest thing to a dedicated tweeter. Whether it's the caps, the filters or a combination of the two, it's probably what they're doing with the drivers - much more than the drivers - that is making the difference from one set of monitors to the next.
Whatever the case, I think it's time we took it to the next level. Being the little guy puts us at a capital disadvantage but our weakness is also our greatest virtue. A corporate product rollout is a very stiff thing. These guys have so much money dedicated to administrative costs, advertising, et cetera. They don't market what they can't mark-up. They build in vast quantities, according to regimented schedules, for a fixed release date. They don't like to update an existing product while they have stockpiles of it waiting to be sold to distributors. The need to maximize profitability is their bottleneck. A cottage-made IEM, made with quality materials, still has David's chance against Goliath.