AudioMan2013
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Posts
- 307
- Likes
- 55
I was drooling at the Stanford Labs 10Mhz atomic clock standard. So would a reclocker with a 10Mhz input with a reference clock standard not improve jitter? I was considering this as a next year purchase but if you say it wont improve jitter, then I will forget it. Im new to this level of jitter control so there is a lot for me to learn.You could try something like the ifi spdif purifier perhaps. That's not too expensive and does a decent job.
May pll will take care of the rest.
As to external clocks, the issue is that whilst WORD clocks can sometimes provide an improvement over a DACs internal clock, not many companies actually do this as it requires two different clock rates. DCS is an example of a company that does.
Most other manufacturers are using 10Mhz clocks which for audio performance is quite frankly an incredibly bad idea as its not mechanically possible for them to improve jitter performance and they can only ever make things slightly worse
The ifi spdif purifier doesnt seem to have an optical input. But will output it. DCS is nice but way out of my price range.
I was going to try optical toslink in and optical toslink out from my RME adi2 pro fs but today I wasnt feeling well so it will possibly be tomorrow. I use the RME to digitize vinyl into dsd256 and it does a phenomenal job. I power it with a large 12v lithium battery and the results were mind blowing. It will be interesting to see how it impacts the May.
Last edited: