K.T.
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2003
- Posts
- 460
- Likes
- 59
Thanks for the great review, Mark.
Wow, the way you described these, they seem to be right up my alley soundwise.
Unlike a lot of folks, I couldn't quite cotton to the RE-400. The slightly unrefined treble was a problem for me, but more importantly I never felt they let loose and flowed to the extent that I could connect to the music. They did a lot of things really well, but didn't breathe to the extent I like. The overall feeling I had was that they were technically very good, but too stiff and mechanical sounding (in terms of musical flow) to move me. I felt that some of the emotional content of the music was not communicated.
So it sounds like these RE-300s may be the ticket for me. The fact that they are less expensive is a bonus, too. Even if the RE-400 may be more detailed, that sense of flow and emotional connection is more important to me, personally.
I wonder how these compare to the Creative Aurvana 3 IEMs? The Creatives also have a warm, flowing, intimate sound. Where they fall short, IMO, is that they lack focus and drive. This gives them a very listenable quality, but they ultimately come of as a little bland and unexciting. So I hope the RE-300s are better in this regard.
I recently got the RE-600 and, wow, I connected with these immediately. They are what I initially hoped the RE-400 would be. The midrange of the RE-600 immediately grabbed me. It has something of a hypnotic quality to it, which is really nice. The RE-600s have that sense of flow and nuance that the RE-400s lack, and that really made a world of difference to me.
Now, my RE-600s have only a few hours on them, but if there's one complaint I have is that the bass seems to be somewhat small and constrained sounding. This may clear up with more use, but compared to my Phonak PFE-232 and Sony HBA-X40, the RE-600's seem to be missing balance, the bass sounding a little too small and recessed. I hope they improve with more use.
But the RE-300 sounds like something I'd like to try. Thanks for the review!
Wow, the way you described these, they seem to be right up my alley soundwise.
Unlike a lot of folks, I couldn't quite cotton to the RE-400. The slightly unrefined treble was a problem for me, but more importantly I never felt they let loose and flowed to the extent that I could connect to the music. They did a lot of things really well, but didn't breathe to the extent I like. The overall feeling I had was that they were technically very good, but too stiff and mechanical sounding (in terms of musical flow) to move me. I felt that some of the emotional content of the music was not communicated.
So it sounds like these RE-300s may be the ticket for me. The fact that they are less expensive is a bonus, too. Even if the RE-400 may be more detailed, that sense of flow and emotional connection is more important to me, personally.
I wonder how these compare to the Creative Aurvana 3 IEMs? The Creatives also have a warm, flowing, intimate sound. Where they fall short, IMO, is that they lack focus and drive. This gives them a very listenable quality, but they ultimately come of as a little bland and unexciting. So I hope the RE-300s are better in this regard.
I recently got the RE-600 and, wow, I connected with these immediately. They are what I initially hoped the RE-400 would be. The midrange of the RE-600 immediately grabbed me. It has something of a hypnotic quality to it, which is really nice. The RE-600s have that sense of flow and nuance that the RE-400s lack, and that really made a world of difference to me.
Now, my RE-600s have only a few hours on them, but if there's one complaint I have is that the bass seems to be somewhat small and constrained sounding. This may clear up with more use, but compared to my Phonak PFE-232 and Sony HBA-X40, the RE-600's seem to be missing balance, the bass sounding a little too small and recessed. I hope they improve with more use.
But the RE-300 sounds like something I'd like to try. Thanks for the review!