I'm pretty happy right now with HEKV2 and Arya as backup. Feel like these are good all arounders and forgiving to bad recordings. Plus the comfort and non-fatiguing listen is exactly what I want. I feel like i found the sound I want. .
Agreed, and both are excellent choices, if you ask me. I never foresaw nor planned this, but over the years, I have collected so many HFM cans that I have had to recognize them as constituting my preferred default "house sound"--i.e they produce quite effortlessly the the sound that my ears instinctively recognize as the most "natural," among all the others I happen to have. Till today, it is still far easier for me to blind-buy a Hifiman can, or repurchase one I have already sold, than it is for every other type of can I owned. I have never experienced any regret doing so, even though I never expressly or voluntarily planned to be such a big fan of the Hifiman sound, It was as much a matter of these cans slowly and progressively "choosing" me by educating my ears, as it was one of my choosing them as I progressively purchased one after the other and their sound growing on me till I came to the recognition and admission i have spoken about... I see no down sides to this process at all, apart from committing occasional follies that I cannot fully explain (such as buying a second Sundara i could have done without for exclusive use in my office, because i found a great deal on that 2nd pair and could not resist. In my defense, the Sundara has turned out to be my most favorite can for listening casually to music, movies, and other programs on my computer and hand-held devices
without any amp. That preference is what inspired me to choose one exclusively for office use, but I digress...
"How do you think those compare to your HiFiMan's? And what would you say is a flaw of the Abyss 1266 TC?"
I like the 1266 TC and other non-Susvara alternatives, from other brands (Audeze, Sennheiser) because of the different listening flavors they bring to the table. However, ironically, sometimes I suspect that I am chasing those alternative flavors, at least partially, out of a concern for keeping my affection for the hifiman fresh, by preventing them from becoming too monotonous as. a listening diet, and me from becoming bored with it.
With that said, I think the 1266 TC slams and punches really hard and deep when the source calls for it, without losing any of its spaciousness, airiness, its powers of instrument separation, detail retrieval, as well its size of soundstage, which is always quite significantly huge. That is why I pointed them out to you. In this respect of extra slam and punch, they compare very favorably with the Hifiman cans (notably the Susvara), which are not necessarily slouches when it comes to slamming and punching, but we are speaking of "going for broke" in punching and slamming when listening to the 1266 TC, types of slamming and punching which could become excessive sometimes depending on the music at the source and how one prefers to hear it'll. Typically, for many of the genres I habitually listen to, the hifiman cans give me as much slam and punch as I'll ever need and are more than satisfying...
Regarding possible flaws, I occasionally read about the 1266 TC's "sucked out mids" or something to that effect, but this is more of a critique I have encountered in reviews I have read about them, than it is some unpleasant experience I have had first hand in listening to the 1266 TC myself. Personally, I do not miss any kind of "mids" when listening to the 1266 TC, but that might because of the genres of music I habitually listen to and how I prefer to hear them with the TC. Besides, whenever I am craving a particular richness of mids, I always have the Audeze cans to turn to, but I do not necessarily want to think of any flavors I might prefer in the Audeze cans as "flaws" of the TC, if you see what I mean.