Quote:
I don't quite agree with this. The HF-1's are different from the SR-225's. Are they better? Well, I imagine most people would prefer the HF-1's. The SR-225's are more dry, clinical, thin and don't have the the same amount of bass. But if you're looking for a more "neutral" or accurate headphone, or value more clarity, especially in crisp treble, I'd look to the SR-225's.
I will say my gut is that the HF-1 driver seems more musical (whatever that means) than the SR-225's, but we haven't seen it really reach its potential. I had been skeptical of all these people spending money to mod their HF-1's, esp since I'm such a fan of the RS-1, but now that I actually own a HF-1, I'm starting to appreciate what they're reaching for.
Oh, and by far, the HF-1 is the fuzzier headphone.
Best regards,
-Jason
Originally Posted by augustwest Comparing the HF1's to the 225's, does the HF1's a grave dis-service. The HF1's are way better! - augustwest |
I don't quite agree with this. The HF-1's are different from the SR-225's. Are they better? Well, I imagine most people would prefer the HF-1's. The SR-225's are more dry, clinical, thin and don't have the the same amount of bass. But if you're looking for a more "neutral" or accurate headphone, or value more clarity, especially in crisp treble, I'd look to the SR-225's.
I will say my gut is that the HF-1 driver seems more musical (whatever that means) than the SR-225's, but we haven't seen it really reach its potential. I had been skeptical of all these people spending money to mod their HF-1's, esp since I'm such a fan of the RS-1, but now that I actually own a HF-1, I'm starting to appreciate what they're reaching for.
Oh, and by far, the HF-1 is the fuzzier headphone.
Best regards,
-Jason