Lunatique
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Posts
- 1,481
- Likes
- 384
Quote:
I agree, and that's one of my concerns. I know that headphones have inherent physical limitations, and they really shouldn't be reproducing those sub-bass notes as that's asking too much of them. But since I often work late into the night, or even when I'm just gaming, I want headphones that can really reproduce that "oomph" so I get the same feeling I have when I listen to my O300D's. But as you said, that comes with its own problems and some kind of promise will be made.
I have heard the HD800, but based on the graphs alone, the HD800 might simply not produce enough sub-bass (it looks very similar in the graph to the HD650, which I have and it totally fails to reproduce visceral sub-bass impact). Although I understand people rave about it's incredible resolution and detail.
Should I take your recommendation for the D5000 as some kind of unsaid comment about the D7000's bass being a bit too much? (And funny enough, I'm looking for something that is just a tad stronger in the sub bass than the M50, and it seems the D7000 fits the bill.) But if spending less will get me closer to headphones I can really trust (relatively speaking), then why the hell not? I keep reading all these people saying how the D7000 is definitely better than the D5000 though, but then again, we know how insane some audiophile weirdos are.
I wonder if you could elaborate a bit on the relevant differences between the D5000 and the D7000's overall sound? I think it's down to these two for me.
Originally Posted by Tyll Hertsens /img/forum/go_quote.gif I think the problem is you are concerned with an area of response that headphones just done do very well. (~20-40 Hz) To a significant extent, on speakers these frequencies are as much felt as heard. On headphones you just don't get the chest/nasal cavity compression or bone conducted info that you do with speakers. If you try to compensate on headphones by bumping up the bass, you are just opening the door to other kinds of imbalances or audio distortions. I think you'd be better served overall by D5000 which is nice and linear with a fairly strong bass (or a HD 800 if you can use open cans) and learn that new acoustic. I simply don't think headphones will do what your speakers do, and if you force the bass issue you'll get errors elsewhere. |
I agree, and that's one of my concerns. I know that headphones have inherent physical limitations, and they really shouldn't be reproducing those sub-bass notes as that's asking too much of them. But since I often work late into the night, or even when I'm just gaming, I want headphones that can really reproduce that "oomph" so I get the same feeling I have when I listen to my O300D's. But as you said, that comes with its own problems and some kind of promise will be made.
I have heard the HD800, but based on the graphs alone, the HD800 might simply not produce enough sub-bass (it looks very similar in the graph to the HD650, which I have and it totally fails to reproduce visceral sub-bass impact). Although I understand people rave about it's incredible resolution and detail.
Should I take your recommendation for the D5000 as some kind of unsaid comment about the D7000's bass being a bit too much? (And funny enough, I'm looking for something that is just a tad stronger in the sub bass than the M50, and it seems the D7000 fits the bill.) But if spending less will get me closer to headphones I can really trust (relatively speaking), then why the hell not? I keep reading all these people saying how the D7000 is definitely better than the D5000 though, but then again, we know how insane some audiophile weirdos are.
I wonder if you could elaborate a bit on the relevant differences between the D5000 and the D7000's overall sound? I think it's down to these two for me.