xnor
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 28, 2009
- Posts
- 4,092
- Likes
- 227
Meremoth, before you can ask that you have to establish that there are two such amps where people hear differences in blind tests. Please let us know asap and good luck.
Meremoth, before you can ask that you have to establish that there are two such amps where people hear differences in blind tests. Please let us know asap and good luck.
Please just go away. Thanks.
Now for that mute...
So you can't. That's okay.
What's not okay is asking why 2+2 can equal 4 but also 5, when you haven't shown the latter.
Meremoth, before you can ask that you have to establish that there are two such amps where people hear differences in blind tests. Please let us know asap and good luck.
What's also not okay is you obsessively following me to different threads trying to make some random/arbitrary point that I not even sure what it is, nor do I care in the slightest. The fact you think I do care is fairly egotistical, and the fact you won't leave me alone is just creepy and weird.
xnor does have a good point, and here's why. Much can be done with the design and construction of an amp to suggest that it sounds more aggressive, mellow, etc. It can get down to the finish of the cabinet, choice of knob, physical size and shape, weight, and other factors. While there's no published research that ties any of these qualities to a specific sonic impression, if you remove all sensory input except the resulting audio, even remove the knowledge of exactly what amplifiers are involved, then test them by auditioning (that's what an ABX test does), the ability of a listener to distinguish between amplifiers diminishes to that equal to a random guess much of the time. There are exceptions, but if we stick to your rules of identical power, source impedance, and I'll add frequency response too, because it can be deliberately altered, they become indistinguishable in anything but a fully sighted test.
Why would anyone want an amp that alters the sound? That's what signal processing and EQ are for. You want to control the amount of coloration or lack of coloration, not have it hard wired in.
If amps sounded different, every time you got a new set of headphones, you'd have to find the amp that matches it. What would work for one wouldn't work at all for another. Total chaos.
Well, that's what people do anyway each time they get a new amp or headphones. With that exact reasoning.
Man! If I had to do that with my speakers, I'd be starting over again every 8 years or so. That would be a chore.
I allow the transducer to be the variable because I don't have any choice. Everything else better be performing to spec, or it goes back for a refund.