Quote:
Originally Posted by dontstopthemusic /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Your signature mentions D2000s. The Ultrasones are much better than the 2000's then?
How would you compare the two in a nutshell - I'm trying to decide between the two.
Thanks!
|
Yes personally I find the Ultrasones a lot more entertaining, while the Denons being neutral are rather boring. A big factor I take into consideration is how energetic a headphone is, I love the speed and incredible detail of the HFI-780s, perhaps only surpassed by Sony SA 3/5000 series and even then owners that have had both prefer the Ultrasones.
I agree with FallenAngel, the Denons have a larger soundstage, that being from left to right and they are most certainly very comfortable headphones. They're more natural sounding so in theory acoustic music and... folk should sound better, however I preferred my HD580s for that genre, or the PK3 I currently own. The 780s soundstage is different, with the Denons your sat in front of the band/orchestra/group listening to them, the 780s place you in the middle of it, left and right is then replaced by forwards, backwards, up, down, left, right... you get the idea.
Another factor for the Denons is they are extremely source revealing, the better the source/amp/dac the better they will sound. Plugging the Denons directly into my Zune and turning the volume up will create distortion, this is not the case with the Ultrasones, therefor the Denons require more juice.
I suppose it would ultimately come down to what you listen too, then again I read on the ALO website; "The new HFI-780 (formerly the HFI-700) was created to be one of the all-around best headphones ever made."