needmoretoys
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Posts
- 238
- Likes
- 46
Among others, I currently have 2 pair of HD590 and one DT880. One of the HD590 has an Equinox cable and the other is stock Senn cable. Since I have a GS-1, it is easy to compare the HD590s. The stock one is a 2002 purchase and the Equinox one was bought this January. My wife and I both think that the Equinox one sounds better, but we can't really say exactly why. If I could listen to one of them and not see which cable it has, I doubt if I could say which one it was with any consistancy. The difference between the standard DT880 and the Equinox HD590 is so much greater.
OK, after all of this rambling, here is my question. The stock HD590 cable is much thinner than the DT880 cable (0.106 in dia vs. 0.159 in dia). The HD590 is OFC and I can't find what the DT880 core is. I assume that it is OFC. Does the semmingly better cable on the DT880 mean that it will benefit less from a cable upgrade than the HD590 (or other Senn)? I believe that most (all) Senns have thinner cables. Is this the reason that Senns are upgraded the most, or is it just because they are so easy to upgrade?
By the way, possibly my hearing is the reason I cannot tell much difference between cables. I am 61 years old, but I can still hear up to about 12K Hz in both ears, with my left ear being slightly better.
As a side note, I noticed something slightly humorous on the DT880 box (old style). On the features on the side pannel it lists the cord as single-sided coiled cable, but on the rear panel (specifications) it lists the cable as single-sided straight cable. The cable is straight.
OK, after all of this rambling, here is my question. The stock HD590 cable is much thinner than the DT880 cable (0.106 in dia vs. 0.159 in dia). The HD590 is OFC and I can't find what the DT880 core is. I assume that it is OFC. Does the semmingly better cable on the DT880 mean that it will benefit less from a cable upgrade than the HD590 (or other Senn)? I believe that most (all) Senns have thinner cables. Is this the reason that Senns are upgraded the most, or is it just because they are so easy to upgrade?
By the way, possibly my hearing is the reason I cannot tell much difference between cables. I am 61 years old, but I can still hear up to about 12K Hz in both ears, with my left ear being slightly better.
As a side note, I noticed something slightly humorous on the DT880 box (old style). On the features on the side pannel it lists the cord as single-sided coiled cable, but on the rear panel (specifications) it lists the cable as single-sided straight cable. The cable is straight.