Headphone & Amp Impedance Questions? Find the answers here!

May 20, 2012 at 7:22 AM Post #61 of 580
Quote:
Oh yeah, but every OT hp amp I've seen has such taps routed through a rotary switch (Cayin, Woo, etc) so I figured it was safe to assume as global.
redface.gif

 
Oh,  I didn't know all those headphone amps have rotary switches.  my turn to be......
redface.gif

I seem to remember seeing a few cheaper one without taps?
I think Little Dot makes a few without taps?   Or have I imbibed too much Sarian Brandy?
 
May 20, 2012 at 9:10 AM Post #62 of 580
May 20, 2012 at 8:51 PM Post #63 of 580
Oh,  I didn't know all those headphone amps have rotary switches.  my turn to be...... :o
I seem to remember seeing a few cheaper one without taps?
I think Little Dot makes a few without taps?   Or have I imbibed too much Sarian Brandy?


Those are OTL models afaik; they're fairly popular from what I've seen.
 
May 29, 2012 at 9:12 PM Post #64 of 580
Any advantages/disadvantages of OTL ? From what I know, they're mostly for high impedance headphones.
 
May 29, 2012 at 9:33 PM Post #65 of 580
OTLs have a high output impedance so they work better with high impedance cans.
Output impedance ranges from approx. 60 to 100 ohms, which is really dictated by the output tube used.
Since they don't have output transformers, they are cheaper than tube amps with output transformers.
And since they don't have output transformers, theoretically they would have lower distortion and a wider bandwith than transformer coupled tube amps.
 
May 29, 2012 at 10:24 PM Post #66 of 580
OTLs have a high output impedance so they work better with high impedance cans.
Output impedance ranges from approx. 60 to 100 ohms, which is really dictated by the output tube used.
Since they don't have output transformers, they are cheaper than tube amps with output transformers.
And since they don't have output transformers, theoretically they would have lower distortion and a wider bandwith than transformer coupled tube amps.


What he said. :)

From user reviews, they tend to be preferenced for higher impedance headphones (and honestly there's not a lot of high Z cans that I personally like, so I haven't ever tested this out for myself - most OTL amps are dangerous with one of my favorite cans).
 
May 30, 2012 at 12:36 PM Post #67 of 580
Another way to look at this is to say that it is a fairly cost effective way to get into tube amplification:
 
A high impedance 'phone with an OTL tube amp is cheaper than a low impedance 'phone with a transformer coupled tube amp.
Good output transformers are expensive!
 
OTOH: a good solid state amp with drive both low and high impedance cans with ease.
IEM guys seem to get into trouble with excessive gain and noise from poor amp matching, but that is another argument for another day.
 
May 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM Post #68 of 580
So far the only OTL amp I've heard of is the crack OTL, but seems like its a fairly old design, when headphones were inefficient and high impedance.
 
May 31, 2012 at 1:52 AM Post #70 of 580
Quote:
Great thread, but since i don't have any science background... smokes coming out of my ears.

FTFY.
And thanks but I guess you do need a bit of maths/science to understand it.
 
Jun 1, 2012 at 9:17 AM Post #74 of 580
Quote:
Aside from noticing my glaring spelling error (BAH!), I was making a jab at the orthodynamic products that've come about recently.
tongue.gif

 
Yeah, thats what I was thinking of, I couldn't find the word...or-tho-dy-namic
 
Jun 1, 2012 at 1:16 PM Post #75 of 580
Quote:
Aside from noticing my glaring spelling error (BAH!), I was making a jab at the orthodynamic products that've come about recently.
tongue.gif

 
OK, as long as you weren't taking a dig at AKG Q701!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top