Mossback
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Posts
- 178
- Likes
- 30
Quote:
Red herrings aside, rubber would still do better than a solid steel pole in that application. Nobody is arguing against active vibration control since that doesn't come with the BHSE. From your own link:
"For vibration sources, you can utilize low end viscoelastic feet or spring mounts which will significantly reduce noise transmission."
People only assume the steel cone is the better audiophool tool because they look nicer and are generally more expensive. They do not do a better job of decreasing energy transfer from the surface beneath than rubber bumpers.
Yup.
i'm not pushing the metal feet in any way; i'm only suggesting (1) feet do matter to performance (2) that rubber feet may not allow for optimal performance (3) typical is that de-coupling feet are best, followed by grounded cone feet, followed by rubber feet as the most likely order of performance. and (4) you would need to listen to each choice to actually select the best choice.
saying feet don't matter at all is simply wrong. but otherwise i don't think we are really are so far apart in what we are saying.
be open minded to trying things; then trust your ears. you just might learn something and find better performance for little effort.