Going from HD650 to He400i was disappointing
I could hear their potential but they were way too bright.
from my experience eqing the m50s (impossible, the entire high end was too harsh so toning them down lead to recessed highs and a really dull sound) there wasnt much hope for the he400i but it worked very well.
I found that 400, 1k, and between 8-10k were the source of pretty much all the brightness.
If I boost these frequencies they really ring (10k only very slightly, all other bands sound good when boosted , nice and smooth.
I do find with very specific tracks they are better without the EQ but this is really rare, 99% of tracks NEED this EQ or the experience is ruined by the brightness.
still tweaking the volume levels of these problematic frequencies (1k is the worst, 10k is barely an issue) but Im curious do any others find the he400i need EQ to be enjoyable or sound better?
If you have use foobars graphics EQ you could also post your settings.
Edit: Heres one of the EQ presets for foobar - https://ufile.io/xptf6
I could hear their potential but they were way too bright.
from my experience eqing the m50s (impossible, the entire high end was too harsh so toning them down lead to recessed highs and a really dull sound) there wasnt much hope for the he400i but it worked very well.
I found that 400, 1k, and between 8-10k were the source of pretty much all the brightness.
If I boost these frequencies they really ring (10k only very slightly, all other bands sound good when boosted , nice and smooth.
I do find with very specific tracks they are better without the EQ but this is really rare, 99% of tracks NEED this EQ or the experience is ruined by the brightness.
still tweaking the volume levels of these problematic frequencies (1k is the worst, 10k is barely an issue) but Im curious do any others find the he400i need EQ to be enjoyable or sound better?
If you have use foobars graphics EQ you could also post your settings.
Edit: Heres one of the EQ presets for foobar - https://ufile.io/xptf6
Last edited: