[bubba67]

First off, I tried searching the forums but couldn't find the answer.

I purchased the Sennheiser HD650 recently (in transit) and am wondering whether the Pioneer Elite SC-27 has enough juice to drive the HD650s or would I really need a separate amp (such as the Burson 160). Secondarily, if the opinion is that a separate amp is needed, then would one get a bigger improvement in the sound with getting an aftermarket cable or getting the amp?

Thanks.

 

[francisdemarte]

Try it with the receiver first. If your happy with it then there is no need for a separate amp.

 

[Anonanimal]

In my opinion, a quality amp will get you more improvement (by far) than a cable. As francisdemarte stated, see if you like the sound from your receiver. If you do, then you're good!

 

[gbacic]

I strongly recommend getting an amp before getting a cable. Actually, try several amps before getting a cable.

Tubes love the HD650

 

[9pintube]

Quote:

Originally Posted by gbacic /img/forum/go_quote.gif I strongly recommend getting an amp before getting a cable. Actually, try several amps before getting a cable. Tubes love the HD650

ON the MONEY!!!!

 

[bubba67]

Thank you for the suggestions received so far.

I'm wondering whether anyone listened to those cans with a Pioneer Elite receiver and subsequently with a separate amp. I've listened to a pair of HD600s on my receiver, and they sound good to me, but never having listened through a separate dedicated headphone amp I'm
sure if I am missing much (to 43 yr old set of male ears).

If an amp were to be procurred, what about SS Burson HA-160 (much touted on this forum) vs tubed Darkvoice 337 SE or regular?

The consensus seems to be that amp gives better bang than new cabling?

Thank you.