[richbass]

With iBasso T3

Thanks

 

[Xan7hos]

The Shure's have silver rings on the cups, the HD-25's don't.

Also, Sportscasters on ESPN wear HD-25s. They don't wear Shures

cheers!

 

[richbass]

Bump

 

[richbass]

Bump!

 

[kunalraiker]

Mate it all depends on what you are looking for in your headphones,as even though they are not very different-they do have their differences in tems of isolation,comfort and so on.
It does also depend if you will be using an amp or not.
Portability s a factor too.

 

[shake]

They are both compatible with the amp, is that your question?

 

[richbass]

which one sounds better on stock and with T3, is my question.

 

[iPoodz]

HD25s don't improve with amping, I've read. They sounded just fine out of any portable source, when I had them.

 

[Head_case]

...depends on your source. Amping does improve the HD25ii's but you've got to listen over time to compare.

I prefer my HD25 Mark IIs unamped most the time - just more convenient. I don't hear a smaller difference with them using a Fiio5 whereas the 280Pros - huge huge difference.

Haven't tried the Shure equivalents yet. I hear great things about them but I think I'll skip it and try a Beyerdynamic DT880 if I can get my hands on a set..

 

[richbass]

still nothing about shures

bump

 

[richbass]

sat evening bump !

 

[Pianist]

SRH840 sounds better than HD25-1 in every way.

 

[electropop]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pianist /img/forum/go_quote.gif SRH840 sounds better than HD25-1 in every way.

I wholeheartedly agree.

 

[richbass]

Thanks

 

[Stevie114]

Quote:

Originally Posted by electropop /img/forum/go_quote.gif I wholeheartedly agree.

Why is this?
Thanks