StargateRecords
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Posts
- 332
- Likes
- 23
I just recently purchased two slightly different copies of the same CD.
CD 1 is a standard audio recording, from what I can tell.
CD 2 was twice the price and has a sticker which says:
"Stunning sound using 24-bit analog to digital transfers"
I thought the RedBook standard set the encoding at 16-bit/44,100 Hz ?
CD 1 is a standard audio recording, from what I can tell.
CD 2 was twice the price and has a sticker which says:
"Stunning sound using 24-bit analog to digital transfers"
I thought the RedBook standard set the encoding at 16-bit/44,100 Hz ?
I would be very grateful if someone could explain the sticker to me and also, if all my music is taken from CD's which are 16/44 why would I need a 24-bit/96 KHz DAC such as the FiiO E10 to get the most out of the music on my computer ? The reason I ask is that I am struggling to decide between the Leckerton UHA-4, the UHA-6, the iBasso range and the FiiO E10 or any other suitable recommendations. To be used with my Mac and PC as an AMP/DAC and maybe with my iPhone or iPod 5, as an amplifier.
Thanks.
Head Injury
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Posts
- 5,404
- Likes
- 443
That means they used 24 bits when remastering the album. They use 16 bits when they burn it to the CD.
You don't need a 24/96 DAC to get the most out of your music. Higher bit depth and sampling rate is useful for mastering, not for playback. Give this thread a read.
You don't need a 24/96 DAC to get the most out of your music. Higher bit depth and sampling rate is useful for mastering, not for playback. Give this thread a read.
StargateRecords
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Posts
- 332
- Likes
- 23
Okay, thanks. I will read the thread...
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)