bdh
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2004
- Posts
- 549
- Likes
- 65
My take on the RS-2 vs. 325i...
Both have about the same amount of detail
The RS-2 is warmer with fuller mids. The 325i is brighter and sounds more aggressive. On some songs the 325i can be too harsh, but on the majority there's no problem. The bass is about the same on both. And someone said the 325i is echo-y, well mine isn't.
Because of the fuller mids, to me the RS-2 'sounds' better. However, the most important aspect of music\headphones to me is how well it sucks me into the music and lets me forget about the sound. For that the 325i does it better than the RS-2.
Both are using reversed bowls. I listen to them with the iMod and Xin SM-III, which let me fine tune the sound to how I want. I use the 'Rock' EQ setting for the RS-2's and the 'Acoustic' EQ settings for the 325i.
Both have about the same amount of detail
The RS-2 is warmer with fuller mids. The 325i is brighter and sounds more aggressive. On some songs the 325i can be too harsh, but on the majority there's no problem. The bass is about the same on both. And someone said the 325i is echo-y, well mine isn't.
Because of the fuller mids, to me the RS-2 'sounds' better. However, the most important aspect of music\headphones to me is how well it sucks me into the music and lets me forget about the sound. For that the 325i does it better than the RS-2.
Both are using reversed bowls. I listen to them with the iMod and Xin SM-III, which let me fine tune the sound to how I want. I use the 'Rock' EQ setting for the RS-2's and the 'Acoustic' EQ settings for the 325i.