nycbone
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Posts
- 316
- Likes
- 12
I ordered the SR125i from TTVJ late Wed. They were shipped directly from Grado (about 30 min from my home) and I received them on Fri afternoon. A 1/4" to 1/8" adapter cable that I ordered was also supposed to be shipped from Grado, but was left out of the package (TTVJ was apologetic and will send one on Mon - not a big deal). This was my 1st purchase from TTVJ, so I received the $10 discount (total ~$157).
I listen to modern (1949 and later) jazz ~95% of the time, with 80's punk, live Grateful Dead and some other oldie (i.e., 'classic') rock thrown in the mix.
Prior to this purchase, my primary headphone has been the SR60.
The SR125i have been connected to a running iPod classic 120 (Apple lossless) --> LOD --> Headroom Micro Amp since they were delivered. I'm using a Radio Shack adapter until the Grado cable arrives.
After ~20 hours of burn-in:
I was looking for better bass response than the SR60, which I find to be a bit muddy. Bass instruments are well-defined and musical with the SR125i, but not at all boomy - just what I was looking for. I'm definitely not a bass head. Charles Mingus' Mingus Ah Um is much-improved.
Higher frequency (particularly brass) instruments are also better-defined than with the SR60 as is the sound stage. One of my favorite recent recordings is Conrad Herwig's The Latin Side of Wayne Shorter with Herwig on Trombone and Brian Lynch on trumpet. This is an superb live recording and it sounded quite good with the SR60s. It's even better with the SR125i - I feel like I'm at the show! Even older Blue Note recordings (Rudy Van Gelder remastered versions - some of which have stereo separation issues) have an improved soundstage with the SR125i. Many of these recordings are difficult to listen to with the SR60. They are a notch above passable with the SR125i.
The SR125i is quite comfortable (as is the SR60). Build quality is similar, although the exterior covering of the cable was double-crimped just above the y-connector, as though the assembler missed the first time and then reattached the cover. It's not a huge deal, but I probably wouldn't have let this pair out of the shop without a new covering. A minor gripe. The thicker cable is a bit shorter (which I appreciate) and far less unwieldly. I like it. The Grado box is labeled 'SR125i.'
At the moment, I'm happy with the SR125i. I choose this model over the SR225i since it comes with the comfy pads and I have comfort issues with the bowl pads that I've tried.
They are definitely a major step-up from the SR60, have a much-improved version of the Grado sound that I enjoy and they fit my current budget.
The SR60 is a decent jazz headphone. The SR125i is a very good jazz headphone. I plan to stick with it.
YMMV.
I listen to modern (1949 and later) jazz ~95% of the time, with 80's punk, live Grateful Dead and some other oldie (i.e., 'classic') rock thrown in the mix.
Prior to this purchase, my primary headphone has been the SR60.
The SR125i have been connected to a running iPod classic 120 (Apple lossless) --> LOD --> Headroom Micro Amp since they were delivered. I'm using a Radio Shack adapter until the Grado cable arrives.
After ~20 hours of burn-in:
I was looking for better bass response than the SR60, which I find to be a bit muddy. Bass instruments are well-defined and musical with the SR125i, but not at all boomy - just what I was looking for. I'm definitely not a bass head. Charles Mingus' Mingus Ah Um is much-improved.
Higher frequency (particularly brass) instruments are also better-defined than with the SR60 as is the sound stage. One of my favorite recent recordings is Conrad Herwig's The Latin Side of Wayne Shorter with Herwig on Trombone and Brian Lynch on trumpet. This is an superb live recording and it sounded quite good with the SR60s. It's even better with the SR125i - I feel like I'm at the show! Even older Blue Note recordings (Rudy Van Gelder remastered versions - some of which have stereo separation issues) have an improved soundstage with the SR125i. Many of these recordings are difficult to listen to with the SR60. They are a notch above passable with the SR125i.
The SR125i is quite comfortable (as is the SR60). Build quality is similar, although the exterior covering of the cable was double-crimped just above the y-connector, as though the assembler missed the first time and then reattached the cover. It's not a huge deal, but I probably wouldn't have let this pair out of the shop without a new covering. A minor gripe. The thicker cable is a bit shorter (which I appreciate) and far less unwieldly. I like it. The Grado box is labeled 'SR125i.'
At the moment, I'm happy with the SR125i. I choose this model over the SR225i since it comes with the comfy pads and I have comfort issues with the bowl pads that I've tried.
They are definitely a major step-up from the SR60, have a much-improved version of the Grado sound that I enjoy and they fit my current budget.
The SR60 is a decent jazz headphone. The SR125i is a very good jazz headphone. I plan to stick with it.
![smile_phones.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/smile_phones.gif)
YMMV.