The 225s are world class headphones, among the best of the best. The SR-60s are among the best of class
in their price range.
I've had the SR-60s for over two years. They were such a huge improvement over the cheap Sonys I was using that I didn't think I'd ever want another pair of headphones as long as I live.
Then I started hanging out at Head-Fi.
I bought the SR-225s a few months ago. Suddenly, I can hear subtle flaws in the SR-60s that I never knew existed (mostly in the high end). The 225s are definitely a noticable improvement (smoother highs and a more engaging musical experience overall), but not as much of an improvement as the SR-60s were over the junk I had previously.
Welcome to the world if diminishing returns in hi-fi. It tends to be true that, after a certain point, you have to double the cost of a component to get the next 10% gain in quality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjc
Is the SR-225 really worth $100.00 more?
|
Only you can decide that. Probably depends on what you're going to do with that $100 if you don't spend it on headphones. If you have to steal the money from your grandma or your kids' college fund, definitely not. If you're going to spend it on p*rn*graphy or crack cocaine, I'd say you're better off with the 'phones.
Keep in mind that you probably won't get out here alive for only $100. Wolfen68 is right...to get the most out of the 225s you'll want to try some
different pads.