Zanth
SHAman who knew of Head-Fi ten years prior to its existence
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Posts
- 9,570
- Likes
- 46
Quote:
It's hard to say. I find they all do very well with resolving microdetails. I find it easier to follow individual instruments with the HP-1000's because the bass does not cloud the lower mid-range, which I found both the RS-1's and PS-1's can do at times. The HP-1000's have a tighter bass so its much easier to follow the notes down below as well, but the PS-1's with their strong bass, is really able to belt it out and those really deep notes shine through more easily with these phones. The RS-1's have good bass, not as bumped as the PS-1's but sloppier as well, not as clean and tight. That is why I used balanced and accurate to describe the RS-1's vs. the PS-1's. Where the RS-1's have less bass so its seems more balanced for the overall sound, it's ability to properly articulate each note is less than the PS-1's. I attributed this phenomenon to the dampening of the PS-1 drivers and the aluminum cups.
As for the highs, I feel they are all equally as detailed and resolving with the RS-1's providing the illusion of more detail because of its more forward high frequencies. When lisetning I could not detect anything new with RS-1's that was not there with HP-1's or PS-1's and I preferred the more relaxed highs of the PS-1's over the RS-1's.
As for the mids, I would have to say they are all very close. Both the PS-1's and RS-1's providing a warmer presentation than the very neutral and perhaps "cool" sounding HP-1's. Depending on the music, I would switch up the phones. If I can't have my perfect Grado, I wouldn't mind having all three of these phones on hand so I can switch up depending on the music. A luxury and one that is not so astronomically unattainable, as for example, owning multiple speakers to do the same
Originally Posted by Shang-Ti Chen Dear Jason, great review. ![]() ![]() |
It's hard to say. I find they all do very well with resolving microdetails. I find it easier to follow individual instruments with the HP-1000's because the bass does not cloud the lower mid-range, which I found both the RS-1's and PS-1's can do at times. The HP-1000's have a tighter bass so its much easier to follow the notes down below as well, but the PS-1's with their strong bass, is really able to belt it out and those really deep notes shine through more easily with these phones. The RS-1's have good bass, not as bumped as the PS-1's but sloppier as well, not as clean and tight. That is why I used balanced and accurate to describe the RS-1's vs. the PS-1's. Where the RS-1's have less bass so its seems more balanced for the overall sound, it's ability to properly articulate each note is less than the PS-1's. I attributed this phenomenon to the dampening of the PS-1 drivers and the aluminum cups.
As for the highs, I feel they are all equally as detailed and resolving with the RS-1's providing the illusion of more detail because of its more forward high frequencies. When lisetning I could not detect anything new with RS-1's that was not there with HP-1's or PS-1's and I preferred the more relaxed highs of the PS-1's over the RS-1's.
As for the mids, I would have to say they are all very close. Both the PS-1's and RS-1's providing a warmer presentation than the very neutral and perhaps "cool" sounding HP-1's. Depending on the music, I would switch up the phones. If I can't have my perfect Grado, I wouldn't mind having all three of these phones on hand so I can switch up depending on the music. A luxury and one that is not so astronomically unattainable, as for example, owning multiple speakers to do the same
