You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Free (legal) 96/24 FLAC download
- Thread starter holdendebeans
- Start date
HippieTom
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2008
- Posts
- 583
- Likes
- 6
Think i must buy myself a X-Fi card again so i can enjoy 24bit.( even if it was fake it was fun with a loudness button.) Is there no way to rip a sacd in 24bit?
jilgiljongiljing
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Posts
- 3,094
- Likes
- 25
only if you take the analog output and record that.
xchagg
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
- Posts
- 180
- Likes
- 0
Just downloaded the tracks and took a listen
Impressive (the classical tracks at least, haven't heard much of the other genres to do a baseline comparison).
Felt that there was greater amount of spatial information in the recording, and greater ease of detail retrieval.
Any idea how much improved recording/mastering techniques contributed, other than being packaged in a 24/96 format?
Felt that there was greater amount of spatial information in the recording, and greater ease of detail retrieval.
Any idea how much improved recording/mastering techniques contributed, other than being packaged in a 24/96 format?
gadgetman
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2009
- Posts
- 345
- Likes
- 10
@xchagg: "Greater ease of detail retrieval" ??
And you're listening this through which set of 24/96-capable DAC?
And you're listening this through which set of 24/96-capable DAC?
xchagg
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
- Posts
- 180
- Likes
- 0
M-Audio Transit ASIO @ 24/96 to Foobar. It's basic, but Foobar hasn't thrown an error message at me, so I'm assuming it works, somehow.
Greater ease of detail retrieval as in I didn't have to concentrate as hard to follow a specific instrument throughout a piece.
Seeing how my DAC is rather basic, I posed the question on how big a factor improved recording or mastering techniques might have played a part in these recordings.
Maybe I should just resample the files to 16/44 and see if I can hear a difference
Greater ease of detail retrieval as in I didn't have to concentrate as hard to follow a specific instrument throughout a piece.
Seeing how my DAC is rather basic, I posed the question on how big a factor improved recording or mastering techniques might have played a part in these recordings.
Maybe I should just resample the files to 16/44 and see if I can hear a difference
holdendebeans
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2007
- Posts
- 182
- Likes
- 10
It's very hard to hear the difference between 24/96 and 16/44 in my opinion. Or should I say with my ears.
A fair amount of credit goes to the recording and mastering techniques. Chesky records is famous for their painstaking efforts in this regard and I believe that this site was started by the guys at Chesky.
The ultimate demonstration disc vol.s 1 and 2 by Chesky are well known here.
A fair amount of credit goes to the recording and mastering techniques. Chesky records is famous for their painstaking efforts in this regard and I believe that this site was started by the guys at Chesky.
The ultimate demonstration disc vol.s 1 and 2 by Chesky are well known here.
Quaddy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2007
- Posts
- 7,410
- Likes
- 18
the marta gomez track is very nice, enjoying that in 24/96, downloading the rest on my slow connection
krmathis
Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2004
- Posts
- 34,759
- Likes
- 82
Quote:
If the DAC don't accept 24-bit files, then you either have to convert the bit depth. Or simply download the 16-bit files...
Some of the fun will be gone though.
Originally Posted by Nocturnal310 /img/forum/go_quote.gif any way to listen to 24 bit files on a 16 bit DAC? |
If the DAC don't accept 24-bit files, then you either have to convert the bit depth. Or simply download the 16-bit files...
Some of the fun will be gone though.
jvlgato
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Posts
- 285
- Likes
- 11
Any portable amp/DACs that accept 24/96?
I thought Pico had a 24/96 DAC, but I must be confused.
Does iBasso D10 do this?
I thought Pico had a 24/96 DAC, but I must be confused.
Does iBasso D10 do this?
nuclearpoweredpenguin
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2008
- Posts
- 66
- Likes
- 13
Thank you, I'm looking forward to hearing these.
xchagg
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
- Posts
- 180
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
If I'm not mistaken, the Pico's DAC upsamples to 24/96, but only accepts 16 bit 44.1/48kHz inputs via USB.
Originally Posted by jvlgato /img/forum/go_quote.gif I thought Pico had a 24/96 DAC, but I must be confused. |
If I'm not mistaken, the Pico's DAC upsamples to 24/96, but only accepts 16 bit 44.1/48kHz inputs via USB.
jvlgato
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Posts
- 285
- Likes
- 11
Wow, that's a drag!
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by xchagg /img/forum/go_quote.gif If I'm not mistaken, the Pico's DAC upsamples to 24/96, but only accepts 16 bit 44.1/48kHz inputs via USB. |
3DCadman
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Posts
- 1,032
- Likes
- 11
Stupid question because I have no idea: If I d/l them, convert to WMA Lossless with Media Monkey, will they play full 24/96 on my Zune?
That is if Media Monkey preserves the 24/96 in the WMA Lossless file?
That is if Media Monkey preserves the 24/96 in the WMA Lossless file?
Resonance
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2008
- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 13
WOW... thanks!
In addition... these have been posted many times... BUT, some people are new (like me) and haven't also heard of these free Hi-Res download sites:
http://01688cb.netsolhost.com/samplerdownload/
High Resolution Music DOWNLOAD services
Download our testfiles
In addition... these have been posted many times... BUT, some people are new (like me) and haven't also heard of these free Hi-Res download sites:
http://01688cb.netsolhost.com/samplerdownload/
High Resolution Music DOWNLOAD services
Download our testfiles
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)