foobar vs winamp
Apr 18, 2006 at 6:02 AM Post #17 of 19
Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesF
One reason I'm still using Winamp is that I can control it even if the Winamp window is buried under a dozen other windiws (global hotkeys). I can pause, skip ahead, adjust volume, etc. I never found the ability to do this in foobar2000, but I admit I haven't looked too hard.

Is this function available in foobar2000?



Yes it is, I use them all the time.
Look under, preferences->Core->Keyboard Shortcuts
 
Apr 18, 2006 at 2:06 PM Post #18 of 19
Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesF
One reason I'm still using Winamp is that I can control it even if the Winamp window is buried under a dozen other windiws (global hotkeys). I can pause, skip ahead, adjust volume, etc. I never found the ability to do this in foobar2000, but I admit I haven't looked too hard.

Is this function available in foobar2000?



Yeah it is. I use foobar over winamp because even my loaded out foobar uses 8 megs of ram, as apposed to winamps 18-20 megs. Since I'm always running foobar in the background behind games, I wanted a lighter program. I like foobar more than winamp too, looks nicer, better customization.
 
Apr 18, 2006 at 5:10 PM Post #19 of 19
Quote:

Originally Posted by Skipinder
Look under, preferences->Core->Keyboard Shortcuts


Thanks - I had seen this before but didn't realize I could make them global. It works well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top