whitedragem
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Posts
- 619
- Likes
- 631
a lot of variables, being TV model (flagship models and good sets do have better handling, generally from power boards and ‘a few variables’ being higher qual), and HDMI is a horrible format re:jitter… etc.
most people will tell you - “no” digital is digital, but the truth is, it ‘can’ matter. (and for those who’ve not heard a difference, ‘good for them’)
I wouldn’t worry about it- its a hornets newt of a question and impractical to worry about…
as someone who loves upgraded TV sound, I have been known, for apartment living, to use ancient flagship surround processors as DAC/preamps to offboard power amps etc.
(in hindsight, most of my ‘spot the difference’ re: cables/digital methods ‘making a difference’, has been when feeding into world class ‘top tier’ kit (a Sansui AU919 into Acoustic Research -LSTs was my default ‘go to’ for a decade+, with that amp in the heart of my system for ‘decades’)
It is expensive maintaining vintage kit, and sometimes apartments don’t need such ‘big’ setups…-
but; I love taking TV output and ‘upgrading’, and have done so countless times.
Judging a TOSLINK cable by thickness isn’t really a definitive test.. if you feel it has been flexed a lot over the years, sure grab a replacement, and ‘true’: glass ’grade’ fibre optic cables are a step up generally, but not always better than well built ‘plastic’ parts… (and lets not argue the semantics of ‘glass’ in a cable…(is it?))..
Whilst upgrading a fibre optic cable would make sense to someone running a ladder dac (r-2R DAC), it isn’t worth putting budget into cables at this level when that coin can go to actual front end kit/speakers (they will make a bigger Sound Quality change),.. cables should be done with hobby money, and when you want ’more’ from a system (and are already familiar with your kit).
What might be a ‘great buy’ would be an iFi AC conditioner part (that can go into existing setup easily), but again, ‘down the track’.
Know your system first.
If it gives you the sound you are seeking, what point would changing a cable even serve, other than being a theoretical improvement.
It is true that some SPDIF transmitters do a VASTLY better job (into reference grade processors (not integrated surround amps) the difference can be night/day (wider soundfield/cleaner steering/imaging etc..)
BTW those shield devices are awesome as is the amazon stick.. you’ve got the goods for getting the best A/V formats: ’nice’.
Seriously- at this point - take a break, pat yourself on the back,.. you’ve got there…
save some coin for a drink or whatever helps you relax, as being relaxed, when listening to audio WILL make a BIG DIFFERENCE to how you hear/‘what you hear’.
With a setup like that, I’d probably feed the shield box, assuming it has a fibre optic output, straight to endpoint, rather than going through TV, but then have the nightmare of potentially more steps involved for ‘regular TV viewing’ (although the HDMI might still feed a duplicate to the TV).
Some TVs can have the screen defeated but remain turned on.. I wouldn’t encourage you to use the TV as a switchbox, but it is easy to do… it comes down to how ‘family friendly’ the setup is…
how many remotes, and how hard to switch to the next use etc..
keeping stuff simple, and having ‘great two channel sound’ is where you are heading to…
If you do have the most budget TV available (ie you bought the biggest set your money could buy, but it required an odd brand name to ‘be the part’) you may wish to try and run straight from devices(shield) etc straight to DAC where possible..
If you DAC has multiple inputs there is a lot of things that can be done here…
and there are always adaptors and dongles and ‘thinking outside the box’; eg I keep an old DAC Magic (cambridge audio) around as it can switch USB to COAX/TosLink (eg useful for PS5)
pretty sure you have a community to raise questions with, and you have figured out how to vocalise your ideas there (here), so ; your future seems golden to me…
cheers.. (ps I have six super high quality Toslink cables in the room with me right now.. , and my best transport has the worst cable on it.. (also the width of a dry spaghetti noodle), and it does its task admirably. - I do do my best to keep it ‘unkinked’.. your astros may not have been so kind,.. but only you know the history… cable damage will still ‘work’ but the bass definition will be somewhat lost, the imaging prowess will be lessened, and depth/stage information will be subpar,.. but >90% of headfi would call bull on this statement (and the soundscience lawyers would demand I give reasons for how this is so) (I have many times, as have many others,.. but lets face it: no one cares)
Headfi is a hobby. You are its’ master, not its slave.
draw a line in the sand an DO NOT CROSS IT. Only way to get out where you still sometimes save for ‘other projects and hobbies’)
most people will tell you - “no” digital is digital, but the truth is, it ‘can’ matter. (and for those who’ve not heard a difference, ‘good for them’)
I wouldn’t worry about it- its a hornets newt of a question and impractical to worry about…
as someone who loves upgraded TV sound, I have been known, for apartment living, to use ancient flagship surround processors as DAC/preamps to offboard power amps etc.
(in hindsight, most of my ‘spot the difference’ re: cables/digital methods ‘making a difference’, has been when feeding into world class ‘top tier’ kit (a Sansui AU919 into Acoustic Research -LSTs was my default ‘go to’ for a decade+, with that amp in the heart of my system for ‘decades’)
It is expensive maintaining vintage kit, and sometimes apartments don’t need such ‘big’ setups…-
but; I love taking TV output and ‘upgrading’, and have done so countless times.
Judging a TOSLINK cable by thickness isn’t really a definitive test.. if you feel it has been flexed a lot over the years, sure grab a replacement, and ‘true’: glass ’grade’ fibre optic cables are a step up generally, but not always better than well built ‘plastic’ parts… (and lets not argue the semantics of ‘glass’ in a cable…(is it?))..
Whilst upgrading a fibre optic cable would make sense to someone running a ladder dac (r-2R DAC), it isn’t worth putting budget into cables at this level when that coin can go to actual front end kit/speakers (they will make a bigger Sound Quality change),.. cables should be done with hobby money, and when you want ’more’ from a system (and are already familiar with your kit).
What might be a ‘great buy’ would be an iFi AC conditioner part (that can go into existing setup easily), but again, ‘down the track’.
Know your system first.
If it gives you the sound you are seeking, what point would changing a cable even serve, other than being a theoretical improvement.
It is true that some SPDIF transmitters do a VASTLY better job (into reference grade processors (not integrated surround amps) the difference can be night/day (wider soundfield/cleaner steering/imaging etc..)
BTW those shield devices are awesome as is the amazon stick.. you’ve got the goods for getting the best A/V formats: ’nice’.
Seriously- at this point - take a break, pat yourself on the back,.. you’ve got there…
save some coin for a drink or whatever helps you relax, as being relaxed, when listening to audio WILL make a BIG DIFFERENCE to how you hear/‘what you hear’.
With a setup like that, I’d probably feed the shield box, assuming it has a fibre optic output, straight to endpoint, rather than going through TV, but then have the nightmare of potentially more steps involved for ‘regular TV viewing’ (although the HDMI might still feed a duplicate to the TV).
Some TVs can have the screen defeated but remain turned on.. I wouldn’t encourage you to use the TV as a switchbox, but it is easy to do… it comes down to how ‘family friendly’ the setup is…
how many remotes, and how hard to switch to the next use etc..
keeping stuff simple, and having ‘great two channel sound’ is where you are heading to…
If you do have the most budget TV available (ie you bought the biggest set your money could buy, but it required an odd brand name to ‘be the part’) you may wish to try and run straight from devices(shield) etc straight to DAC where possible..
If you DAC has multiple inputs there is a lot of things that can be done here…
and there are always adaptors and dongles and ‘thinking outside the box’; eg I keep an old DAC Magic (cambridge audio) around as it can switch USB to COAX/TosLink (eg useful for PS5)
pretty sure you have a community to raise questions with, and you have figured out how to vocalise your ideas there (here), so ; your future seems golden to me…
cheers.. (ps I have six super high quality Toslink cables in the room with me right now.. , and my best transport has the worst cable on it.. (also the width of a dry spaghetti noodle), and it does its task admirably. - I do do my best to keep it ‘unkinked’.. your astros may not have been so kind,.. but only you know the history… cable damage will still ‘work’ but the bass definition will be somewhat lost, the imaging prowess will be lessened, and depth/stage information will be subpar,.. but >90% of headfi would call bull on this statement (and the soundscience lawyers would demand I give reasons for how this is so) (I have many times, as have many others,.. but lets face it: no one cares)
Headfi is a hobby. You are its’ master, not its slave.
draw a line in the sand an DO NOT CROSS IT. Only way to get out where you still sometimes save for ‘other projects and hobbies’)