Have you actually heard the Immanis? I am a very simple guy when it comes to audio: sounds good and enjoyable? I buy it. Doesn't sound good? I don't buy it. I couldn't care less about what measurements show.You’re right not everything can be groked via a graph, BUT massive problems like backwaves unattended to that create a mess of a sawtooth response is not hokus pokus - neither is the bass roll off. This is something that is very much audible if you know what to listen for. Of course there is individual hearing and the way our heads are shaped that comes into play - especially with what happens to the sound north of 1-2k…but the Immanis is still very much a headphone with objective flaws. Whether or not those flaws are pleasing to the listener is then entirely subjective. My point is that you can get similar flawed presentation for much less, but that doesn’t account for the mountain of expectation bias that naturally forms around headphones with these insane price tags. Human beings can’t just turn off bias.
I’ve heard every other Raal offering before, like mentioned above. They sound exactly like they measure ie poor to these ears. The one with the Star Wars design that rests on your temples sound like a lesser take on an old school AKG with very forward mids and the newer one that looked like a scarecrow with scourers as pads sounded like a bass boosted old school Audeze with even less upper mids. Both of which can be seen over a proper measurement.
I’m not saying that some folks won’t like the sound.
…and yes let’s get back to the D7000![]()

But I guess we should stop polluting the D7K thread.
