angpsi
1000+ Head-Fier
Elise with Mullard EF80 and GE 6as7GA sounds so good I've been listening the whole day. The high end sparkle and the bass it has developed, is sleep depriving. Be warn guys. If you can't sleep, don't blame me.
Man, you're gonna have us sailing on a completely new trip...
Regarding the article I mentioned, the important part for me is exactly that it all eventually comes down to a preferred sound signature:
(...) Many audio engineers disagree. Scott Metcalfe, for example, says that recording to analog tape isn't any purer than recording music digitally. But the distortion and pitch variation that analog tape adds to the recording are preferred by some artists and audiences.
"I think there are few people who would tell you that recording classical music to analog tape has any benefit at all," Metcalfe says. But for some artists, he says — particularly in rock — those layers of distortion are preferable.
Quote:
Ludwig says he mastered White's Lazaretto on analog tape not because it's a better way to master but because "it's what [White] wanted."
"For many world-class mixers," Ludwig says, "mixing to analog tape has no advantages if what comes out of the console is exactly what you want."
"But if you say the whole experience — just like smoking cigars with friends — [is better], well, do it. Enjoy smoking cigars with friends, and drink beer and brandy and enjoy listening to an old-fashioned record player. But don't say the sound is better.
"You may say it sounds better to you. That's OK. That's a subjective matter."
Of course, the reproduction chain also plays its part.
Clearmountain and Ludwig say that early analog-to-digital converters had an industrial sound, which made CDs sound brittle. But when Apogee Electronics (...) developed the first high-quality converters in 1985, the sound came into focus.
"It wasn't until CDs actually started to sound good [that I went]: 'That's what it sounded like. That's what I remember doing in the studio,'" Clearmountain says.
As far as I'm concerned, even live music reproduction can equally be considered as artificial, as well as natural. For example, how does the acoustic treatment of a music hall—or a listening room—affect the perceived sound? One can even argue that some performances are 'tuned', or even written, according to the hall they are intended for (see, e.g., David Byrne's TED talk).
I found the article educational exactly in this regard; and actually this is why I used @HPLobster's post about sound production as a reference.
P.S. Similar to my explorations with tubes (i.e. the Elise), I am gradually becoming interested in playing around with vinyl. Haven't decided whether it's a vice or a virtue. Solid state & digital seemed much more of a straight deal, and in a way more agnostic to personal tuning apart from choosing the 'right' combo in the first place.