[dave-the-rave]

Wake up, youu hosers! It says "generic brand" in the ad.

 

[Aman]

It didn't say that before

It's a different catalogue than when this thread was originally posted.

 

[null]

Who cares? It still shows the image of Shure e3cs. I'm still going to investigate.

 

[romesaz]

Hey, a fellow Torontonian... Hm... any news as to whether they are e3cs? If so, I'm heading down tomorrow to pick up a few pairs

. At this price even I cant complain about not being able to afford'em.

 

[Sovkiller]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Iriver It's definately false advertisement. Shure E3c's could not cost .99 unless they are a bootleg that looks like shure e3c.

They stated "generic brand", it doesn't say in any place that they are Shure E3c's....

 

[Vashin]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sovkiller They stated "generic brand", it doesn't say in any place that they are Shure E3c's....

A few days ago... it didn't say generic brand.

 

[DigDub]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vashin A few days ago... it didn't say generic brand.

so they realised their mistake and some lucky dude got 3 pairs for 0.99?

 

[averydonovan]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DigDub so they realised their mistake and some lucky dude got 3 pairs for 0.99?

It says on the bottom of their ad that they are not responsible for typographical errors, so I doubt anybody could have gotten 3 pairs of E3c's for 99 cents. But if it was true, it'd be nice. 3 for 99 cents in Canadian money is like getting them for a nickel apiece in American money (j/k)

 

[Hunter_Killer]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChickenScrtchBoy If they are not E3, we can sue them.

Lol.

Seriously, like that old saying goes, if it seems too good to be true, it is.

 

[null]

I don't know if I'll be able to make it. I'm busy with other stuff. But hey, if someone else wants to venture down there, be my guest.