ECC33/ECC35 Tube Addicts
Jan 5, 2013 at 7:45 AM Post #46 of 67
BTW the ECC33 shown just above, under amp test now, has the code 1324 L9, so it's probably December 1949
 
Jan 5, 2013 at 12:05 PM Post #47 of 67
Quote:
Well, get to it!

 
Feck off! 
tongue.gif

 
It largely boils down to this: Cannot see the getter. How's the lighting in this photo? Is that black or grey? Bloody impossible to tell. Feck this!
 
Jan 5, 2013 at 2:04 PM Post #48 of 67
Quote:
BTW the ECC33 shown just above, under amp test now, has the code 1324 L9, so it's probably December 1949

 
Yep. Do you happen to have the codes on the yellow prints? I've read that yellow (≈ gold) was used in 1970 to celebrate the 50th anniversary year of Mullard (the company). But perhaps there were other times.
 
Jan 5, 2013 at 2:12 PM Post #49 of 67
Oskari, these test 120-130% above the average value and sound wonderful.
 
They were made in 1967, matched pair with code: 5K2 R7J3
 
Jan 5, 2013 at 4:02 PM Post #51 of 67
Hi Oskari, yes I am.
 
BTW They do sound very very good.
 
Jan 6, 2013 at 4:17 PM Post #53 of 67
Quote:
 
Feck off! 
tongue.gif

 
It largely boils down to this: Cannot see the getter. How's the lighting in this photo? Is that black or grey? Bloody impossible to tell. Feck this!

 
Grey staggered plates.  D getter.
 
What else would you like to know?
 
Jul 10, 2014 at 8:47 AM Post #55 of 67
Are ECC33's direct substitutes for 6SN7?  Thanks!
 
Jul 10, 2014 at 8:59 AM Post #56 of 67
The ECC33 has the same heater requirements as a 6SN7.
But it has a much higher μ at 35 compared to 20 for a 6SN7 and a resistance of 9.7KΩ compared to 7.7 KΩ of a 6SN7.
 
Jul 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM Post #57 of 67
Thanks! I better ask Jack Woo whether it will fit in my WA5 then...
 
Apr 1, 2015 at 1:27 PM Post #59 of 67
To me they look like mislabeled B65's, great tubes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top