yobs
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 13, 2007
- Posts
- 123
- Likes
- 0
Several months ago, I purchased a set of Westone UM2s, and to be honest, my initial impressions were not too great. I'd come from a shure e2c and Mylar X3 background. I figured it was just the initial change from one headphone/IEM to another, and the rolled off highs of the UM2 and (I find slightly warm) sound was something I just wasn't used to as yet.
Fast-forward to present, and the UM2s have become one of my most loved possessions. Recently though, I dusted off my Mylars and fired up some favourite tunes.
The first thing I noticed was a night and day difference in BASS. The mylars brought a punchiness to the music, particularly the bass, that I'd been lacking in both my portable (UM2) and home cans (k501 w/ 701 pads). To check that what I was hearing was true, I tried both the x3s and um2s unamped from my Cowon D2. x3 punch > um2 punch. Next I tried them amped via iBasso D1. Same result.
In my IEM past, I tried out the Atrio M5s and found them very punchy, though a bit too low end focused for my liking
. I don't recall how the e2cs were in this regard.
I searched around on head-fi, and noticed funk-o-meter had several posts on this being one of the core differences between armature and dynamic headphones.
My question is, do armature based IEMs ever equal dynamic driver IEMs for overall punchiness? I've read that the e500s are punchy, but can it compare to the X3s (and the Atrio m5s) in this regard?
Or is it a matter of the UM2s just having low punch output?
Fast-forward to present, and the UM2s have become one of my most loved possessions. Recently though, I dusted off my Mylars and fired up some favourite tunes.
The first thing I noticed was a night and day difference in BASS. The mylars brought a punchiness to the music, particularly the bass, that I'd been lacking in both my portable (UM2) and home cans (k501 w/ 701 pads). To check that what I was hearing was true, I tried both the x3s and um2s unamped from my Cowon D2. x3 punch > um2 punch. Next I tried them amped via iBasso D1. Same result.
In my IEM past, I tried out the Atrio M5s and found them very punchy, though a bit too low end focused for my liking
![basshead.gif](http://images/smilies/http://hfimage.head-fi.org/smilies/newsmiles/basshead.gif)
I searched around on head-fi, and noticed funk-o-meter had several posts on this being one of the core differences between armature and dynamic headphones.
My question is, do armature based IEMs ever equal dynamic driver IEMs for overall punchiness? I've read that the e500s are punchy, but can it compare to the X3s (and the Atrio m5s) in this regard?
Or is it a matter of the UM2s just having low punch output?