Jesse40902
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
- Posts
- 453
- Likes
- 0
None of those sound great out of the box? what improves after 100 hours of burn-in?
Does the 555's / A900 need long burn-in time for it to sound great?
- Thread starter Jesse40902
- Start date
skudmunky
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Posts
- 3,555
- Likes
- 11
dunno about those 2, but my AKG k240s sounded great out of the box and have only improved since.
manchau
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2006
- Posts
- 1,063
- Likes
- 10
A900 Should sound better out of the box anyway. I gave my A500 100 hrs to settled down. while after 70 hrs. it remains unchanged till 100.
A900LTD's are real candidate to burn-in properly. Now I have 36 hrs + 25 hrs previous owner. approx. 60 hrs. It's changing drastically and I am on honeymoon phase with it now. But still needs to be more perfect. coz some time during burn-in it disappoint me for a while. then come to it's performance again.
A900LTD's are real candidate to burn-in properly. Now I have 36 hrs + 25 hrs previous owner. approx. 60 hrs. It's changing drastically and I am on honeymoon phase with it now. But still needs to be more perfect. coz some time during burn-in it disappoint me for a while. then come to it's performance again.
mattg3
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Posts
- 631
- Likes
- 53
Took close to 200 hours with hd555 to hear changes
Jesse40902
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
- Posts
- 453
- Likes
- 0
is it dramatic changes?
darkninja67
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2005
- Posts
- 3,252
- Likes
- 15
After around 100 hours my A900s seemed to relax a bit. They did not seem as harsh as they did out of the box. (not that they are really irritating to begin with)
Users who are viewing this thread
