does an mp3 player have much adnantage over a cd/mp3 player?
Jun 6, 2004 at 7:28 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 5

puppet

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Posts
142
Likes
0
because i got an Iriver IFP 380T

and I can get a Sony D-NE300 for $60, now i feel i wasted my money and should have gotten the cd player so i can just burn cd`s.

also, I noticed the Sony D-NE300 can get 90 songs on one cd at 256kb/s.

Are those Atrack songs less quallity then mp3`s because thats pretty awsome.
 
Jun 7, 2004 at 10:24 AM Post #3 of 5
lol. those 128mb/256/512mb things only are good because they are small and can be used as USB devices, anything else and a CD/mp3 player rapes them for size, value.
800mb vs 256mb for like 1/2 the cost, also you can carry more around with you
smily_headphones1.gif


HDmp3 players are in a league unto themselves.....
Smaller than cd player, can be used as data storage, massive storage space, excellent quality.

I personally woulda got the CD/MP3 over the flash mp3 player
frown.gif

the IFP's are one of the best though
 
Jun 7, 2004 at 11:01 AM Post #4 of 5
never been a believer of a memory based player, for some unknown reason.
im using CD/MP3 player, so i can use both cd and mp3 (doh..)...

and i think one or two CDs containing MP3s are more than enough for me to listen when im on the go, so im not so worried about all those 40GB or 20GB stuff.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top