DO 2.1 SPEAKERS NEED BURN-IN??
Technically, the term is "break-in," since this refers to mechanical components - for example the surrounds on dynamic driver speakers - while the even more debatable burn-in refers to inert electrical components. Personally I've only heard that happen to one speaker I've owned, drastic as the changes were, so assuming that there can be speakers that really need (as I can't really verify well enough even for myself) break-in, it's just as possible that not all of them, which can be due to:
1) some of them being given enough run-in time at the factory when they were tested by quality control; arguably only the best speakers would be given a test more rigorous than proper wiring polarity and basic frequency response given the time it would need would cost a lot for the business process
2) difference in materials or fabrication that makes the said components more pliable sooner
Short answer? If it doesn't smooth out within a few days, break-in - whether the drivers or your ears - isn't the cause of the harsh sound.
like LOGITECH Z623.........not unable to listen for hours due to its ear hurting quality satellites sound.
Like I said, it's most likely these weren't broken in at the factory QC, and I can think of other reasons other than materials or fabrication techniques used:
1. These are probably designed more for spectacular SFX than for smoothing out music, as the intended market will probably have more use for hearing glass shattering in a video game than not screwing up (much less deliberately smoothening) a proper recording. It can happen whether it's a single driver all the way to the treble on the satellites with a harsh response common with cheap fullrange drivers, or a 2-way with a harsh peak because of a badly designed crossover.
2. Cheap. Not that it's a bad product, but like I said, spectacular glass-shattering among other SFX, RND costs in parts and time, etc will play a part in that.
3. It could be in the recording. What albums are you listening to? And what other systems can serve as reference (not absolute but relative) that don't have the fatiguing sound you're having trouble with?
4. It could be your ears and mind. Human hearing is not perfectly flat - healthy hearing has a plateau for the midrange (it's part of evolution along with vocal communication, as in talking, vs howling or screeching or leaving a scent trail to the honey flowers); damaged hearing can have a different response (you might just be hearing less of the midrange); or if it's your first system that can play fullrange up to 20khz or so you're just not used to hearing this much of it if at all (when I switch from my midrange-oriented, rolled-off treble IEM on my smartphone to my reference system at home, the latter sounds harsh for the first few minutes)
It sounds harsh , even my 8 years old philips 2.1 blew them out of water in clarity,mids and pleasant natural production though its only of RS.1500 ....same quality costs over Rs.5000 now-a-days.
Go back to my earlier points about your reference system and whether previous systems have fullrange response. It's possible these Philips don't have fullrange playback, or as is more likely (based on the various Philips shelf systems we've had in the kitchen vs the Sonys), they are tuned to be a bit closer to the smooth side. Also the drivers could really be of better quality - what model Philips are those exactly? I still have a Philips2.0 shelf system I keep in the kitchen and the sound is incredibly smooth. Too smooth, given my HD600 sounds harsh compared to them.