ditching MD, want iMP player. suggestions?
Mar 26, 2004 at 5:22 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

heeeraldo

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Posts
216
Likes
1
the title says it all.
I want to sell/throw off a dam my now-defunct MZ-R900, and I don't want to deal with NetMD or Hi-MD. Eventually, I want an iPod, but since tuition's going up again, it's going to remain as an eventuality.

so, yeah.
what should I go for, given that my budget is about 100-150 US, I'll be using it mostly on the go with Eggos and my MP3s are no lower than 192kbps if downloaded, and usually lame VBR if ripped?
 
Mar 26, 2004 at 5:04 PM Post #3 of 7
If you're going to use it for running (as your sig indicates you did with the MZ), I'd stay away from the hard-disk based portables for now--they're just not built for the shock.

I just got through shopping for a flash player, and found that the one for my needs was the MPIO FL100. My main requirements were: shirt pocket size, SD card expandability, and good sound quality, for around US$100. That narrowed my choices to the RCA Lyra 1071, Rio Cali/Chiba, TDK Mojo, and Digitalway MPIO FL100 (all 128MB models). Since I wasn't able to find the TDK locally, it got tossed out of my candidate list immediately, but it may turn out to be a decent player, so if you find it, give it a try and let me know.

The remaining candidates:
RCA Lyra
The good: Small; relatively large display; shows up as a USB mass storage device
The bad: There was a very annoying constant electronic whine (internal EMI issues?), even when paused; very "barebones": no backlight, no extended menu, no radio...; somewhat awkward design
Bottom line: It'd be worth it if they sold this for $40-50 as an SD drive with MP3 playing capability. Circuit City's no-hassle return policy was made for trying out products like this.

Rio Cali/Chiba
(I tried Cali, but they're basically the same player)
The good: Decent sound quality; good menu system; FM tuner; seemed like most durable of the bunch; stopwatch functions
The bad: SD slot is hard to get to
The mediocre: I'm not a big fan of the "RioStick" control, but tastes may vary; while the display wasn't any smaller than the others, it seemed like it was (may be an effect of the recessed setting and amount of data on-screen); not really made for a shirt pocket
NOTE: I tried it in-store with a pre-written SD card full of songs, so I don't actually know about the software.
Bottom line: Good, but didn't fit my tastes. The Cali may be your best option for a player to use while running.

MPIO FL100
The good: Good sound quality; decent menu system; fairly well designed controls; stylish but unobtrusive; firmware seems to be updated frequently; can recover from (and resume in the same spot on the track) SD card ejection during play
The bad: Poor FM reception; flimsy SD and battery doors and hold switch; transfer software doesn't integrate with Windows Explorer (may or may not be an issue for you); Digitalway has taken down their on-site web boards, with no word on when they'll be back up
The mediocre: Plastic-covered mirror face looks nice, but seems like it'll get scratched too easily (I have an iPaq [thus the desire for SD extensibility] and use adhesive screen covers to protect the LCD, so I just cut one down to size, but it's not the prettiest solution); basic play options (shuffle/repeat/folder modes) are made somewhat difficult to change quickly by the complex menu system; easy to hit Next/Prev switch when reaching in pocket for volume control
Bottom Line: The price ($89 at Amazon after $20 rebate, which, unfortunately, is not available in Canada), size, and sound quality (cleaner than either my Audigy or iMP-350; with EX71s, I can tell that the noise floor is there if I turn the volume down to 0 and pause/un-pause, but it's low enough that it disappears after vol 1--with HD497s, it's inaudible) made it the best choice for me. It may not be good for running, though--the controls are decent, but it doesn't seem to be designed to be held in the hand for long periods of time. Digitalway is supposedly working on firmware that'll let it be used as a USB mass storage device, but don't base a purchase on that.

My advice: Don't listen to me.
Find players that meet your own spec requirement and buy based on those findings. If you're not looking for expandability, the options are much wider, but when you can buy a 256MB SD card for $60, it seems worth it to me to go with something you can upgrade. The MB/$ ratio for a flash player is going to be awful either way, when compared to even the MicroDrive based players, but you don't have to worry about etching the platters if you drop it or just shake it the wrong way while jogging.

Good luck.
 
Mar 26, 2004 at 5:10 PM Post #4 of 7
imp as in iriver cd palyer?

you wont get much space out of a flash player, but with $200 you can buy the 4gb creative muvo. otherwise i heard good things about the iriver ifp series, the 256mb version (ifp190) goes for less than $150.
 
Mar 27, 2004 at 2:22 AM Post #5 of 7
I don't run anymore. Not after the car accidents, anyway. I find myself using the MD exclusively on my 1.5 hour commute to school - hence the want of an iRiver CD player.

I guess what I really should've asked is what the differences are between models.
 
Mar 29, 2004 at 4:04 PM Post #6 of 7
Ah--sorry to hear about the accidents.

In that case, I can only comment on the iMP-350, since it's the only one I've used. I have, though, used it extensively for the past 2.2 (or so) years. I haven't abused it, but it has held up through some fairly rough treatment--it's seen Uganda, England, and the heat and rain of Florida and the only complaints I've had are the noise (cheap internal amp circuitry) and the cheap construction of the remote. On the remote: a month or so after I hit the 1 year mark, the pin that held the clip on fell out (making it a tad difficult to attach the remote to my backpack). iRiver tech support replaced it free of charge (except for the minor shipping cost of sending the broken one to them), and the new one has been holding up fairly well, but it still feels cheap, especially relative to the player itself, which is downright tankish compared to the previous PCDPs I've owned.

If you're planning on using the iMP as just a stopgap measure on the road to a HDD-based player, the 350 will probably serve well, and will save you $50 (relative to the price of the 550). (I'd be interested to know about noise level on the 550 [and the iHP series], if anyone has both a 350 and one of the other models and wouldn't mind commenting.)

My previous post's disclaimer applies, though: check the features out, compare to your needs, try to find a place that'll let you try them out.
 
Mar 29, 2004 at 4:24 PM Post #7 of 7
I am happy with my iMP-550. It's as small as can be, has great sound and the features are outstanding. The battery life is a lot longer compared to the iMP-350.
wink.gif

The only problem I have experienced was some skipping during CD-DA playback when I turned off the antishock protection.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top