[size=xx-small] Quote:
Originally posted by markl
....I've e-mailed Rick at VD to let him know about this thread. I've invited him to register and to make any comments here that he'd like. I'm sure he's better able to discuss their technology than I can.... |
[/size]I welcome manufacturers to offer comments and technical answers, as long as they don't resort to any selling.[size=xx-small] Quote:
Originally posted by markl
....And as far as build quality goes, it *is* a $35 cable, marketing hyperbole or no. I wouldn't expect the build quality to compare to the $500 ICs you've cut open or to the build quality of your $350 Acoustic Zen Tsunami, and it's a bit unfair to make such a comparison. I think their claims relate more to sound quality than build quality. Their manufacturing costs are no less than any other manufacturer (well maybe 20% less-- they are in Canada!) , so you shouldn't expect solid gold conductors with diamond tipped IEC prongs. |
[/size]I'm not the one who wrote their marketing material, man. Again, it says:[size=small]
"....It is designed to replace typical stock cord and to compete with the value of the most popular $500 power cords from the traditional electronic design theories...."[/size]If I was selling a $100 headphone that I said, in the marketing material for it, was designed to compete with headphones valued up to $1430 (which includes the Sennheiser HD-600, AKG K1000, etc., and is just shy of the retail value of the Audio Technica ATH-W2002), would it be unfair if someone reviewing this $100 headphone was to compare it to these more expensive headphones given my claims?
Besides, I'm not saying that it won't perform like a $500 cable for everyone. I'm just saying that in my rig, to my ears, and against other cables I've used within the price range the manufacturer claims it's design to compete in, my opinion is that it didn't, sonically or in terms of construction.[size=xx-small] Quote:
Originally posted by markl
No, it seems quite different from the average cable from Home Depot. Wildly different, almost alien. If nothing else, the copper in the Basic is at a much higher purity than the cable you buy at Home Depot. Plus it has the "Dynamic Filtering" provided by the "magic pixie dust" and connectors that are better quality than that provided on the $5 Home Depot cable, making them weigh so much more, apparently adding to their sound quality. So are they different? Yes, they're quite different. Even at a mere $35.... |
[/size]Well, the IEC end of the cable seemed no better to me than any other stock IEC connectors I've seen. The NEMA end seemed better than most stock cables to me. Regarding the purity of the copper in the Virtual Dynamics Basic Power, I haven't found any specific info as to its content or purity. From the Virtual Dynamics web site: Quote:
[size=small]"....It uses standard 18-gauge conductor...."[/size] |
Again, I've found no other specific mention of the Virtual Dynamics Basic Power's conductor purity (if anyone knows any different, please let me know).[size=xx-small] Quote:
Originally posted by markl
....Again, for $35 what was Jude expecting? I think he now owes it to intellectual honesty to compare a $350 VD cable such as the Audition to his current $350 power cable. At the very least, Jude should look at and listen to a Power 1 ($199.00 list, but available at much less) before dismissing the whole VD line, although he did say the Basic cable was better than stock.
What do you say, Jude? I'm sure Rick would be more than happy to lend you any cable of theirs youd like, but again I don't speak for VD in any way shape or form.
Mark |
[/size]My expectations were shaped by the claims made by the manufacturer, and, given the claims, I don't think it so unreasonable at all. And I don't recall "dismissing the whole VD line". I even said I'd be willing to try their higher end cables some other time.
Based on my experience, I'd personally be inclined to use a ~$10 Quail "green dot" hospital grade power cable with larger 14-AWG conductors if given a choice between it and the Virtual Dynamics Basic Power. The Quail, in my rig, to my ears, performed at least as well as the Virtual Dynamics Basic Power -- and, again, I didn't feel either was much better than the stock cable that came with my Max. I felt my ~$100 BPT C-7 power cord offered more noticeable, positive effects in my rig than either the Quail or the Virtual Dynamics Basic Power.
Again, I haven't dismissed the entire Virtual Dynamics line, and I would be interested in trying their higher end products some time in the future. I will admit, however, that, for me (in terms of a start with this line) this exercise was anything but confidence-inspiring. What
does inspire some confidence is the fact that some Head-Fi'ers seem to like their stuff.