kool bubba ice
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Posts
- 8,547
- Likes
- 87
Quote:
One of the negatives of the DT48 is the lack of treble emphasis, especially the a model.. It's practically muted IMO.. I'm a laymen here, but, usually dynamic cans that are called detailed are bright with extended highs, & a heavy treble emphasis in certain frequencies.. So can someone enlighten me, what makes a detailed headphone if it is not treble orientated or bright.
Originally Posted by Gundogan /img/forum/go_quote.gif I find the DX1000 more detailed than the HD600 (and HD650 from remembrance) because of its excellent seperation, soundstage and balanced, controlled bass and they're not hot on the treble (altho maybe a bit more extended/balanced than the HD600). The seperation and soundstage might be a negative thing tho on some records and some (many?) find the DX1000 too much on the bass heavy side. Wouldn't be surprised if a headphone like the DT48 would be even more detailed, looking at its praise here on head-fi and its dead flat freq graphs |
One of the negatives of the DT48 is the lack of treble emphasis, especially the a model.. It's practically muted IMO.. I'm a laymen here, but, usually dynamic cans that are called detailed are bright with extended highs, & a heavy treble emphasis in certain frequencies.. So can someone enlighten me, what makes a detailed headphone if it is not treble orientated or bright.