4N6: I have had the same experience regarding goose bumps!
I had the opportunity today to listen to the Edition 9, JVC DX1000, Denon D2000 and compare them against my reference headphones (Senns HD650 and AKG K701) driven by a RSA Tomahawk (high gain) and iPod nano/lossless. The conclusion: Edition 9 headphones are the less forgiving of poor recordings among the list BUT they really get you into the music. Classical in particular, I did have goose bumps which is very very rare when I listen to headphones. Plus I was in a store with some background noise. I can't imagine at home through my home amp (Opera)! I also believe the highs will be much smoother out of the Opera than through the nano/Tomahawk. Those headphones deserve some serious source and amplification apparently.
Quick comparisons against the Edition 9:
- AKG K701 lack major body which is ok when you listen to them exclusively but when switching to the Ultrasone, there's no going back.
- Senns 650 are really comfortable soundwise. I actually feel they're "close" tonally to the ultrasone but just very mellow. Nice in itself (especially for bad recordings) but quite boring relative to the ultrasone. It just does not move me. Also bass is good but neither as tight or "realistic" as the Ultrasone.
- JVC DX1000 have a nice bass, rather warm sound. But I had a problem with the midrange: it sounds cavernous, hollow. The same feeling I got with many closed headphones (AKG K271 for example). I thus quickly skipped this one. The JVC and Ultrasone are in two different leagues IMO.
- Denon D2000: I did not like them so much because the bass wasn't too firm and the soundstage was quite poor (left / center / right). Overall, the tonal balance is a bit hi-fi I feel (boosted bass and treble, recessed midrange). But they had that kick (you guys call it prat I guess?) that made them more lively than the Senns, sort of reminiscent of the Ultrasone in fact.
The price of Edition 9 is really steep but I almost handed out the credit card today after couple of hours of listening... There are actually good chances I am going to visit there again soon and step out with the Edition 9 in my arms........
arnaud.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4N6 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have a similar collection of headphones as Hardwired, and also have similar impressions. For me, the overall comparison would rank Edition 9 > JVC DX1000 > Denon D5000. I think the JVC's are very open sounding with the best rendition of space, soundstage, and instrumental decay. They also have a very even tonal balance, with terrific bass texture, tonality, and detail, but have coloration in the midrange. The treble is totally non-fatiguing with no excess sibilance. The Denon's are similar with a more neutral tonal balance but the soundstage is a little flat in comparison and I find sibilance to be slightly exaggerated. The Edition 9's have more bass weight, and better delineation of instrumental outlines (imaging). What has separated the Edition 9's for me is that subjective "wow" factor. These are the ONLY headphones in my experience for which I have had goosebumps while listening. Now, I can objectively break down all of the headphones as much as you want, but for me, the "goosebump effect" is a telltale sign of which headphone is the best.
|