ChanSP1970
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2007
- Posts
- 28
- Likes
- 0
I haven't visited Head-Fi for a while and I regret I did this time......
No more new IEM after this one!!
No more new IEM after this one!!
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif I recently got a pair and am burning them in, because they sound quite sterile out of the box. Monster attended the NYC Spring meet this weekend, and donated 3 pairs towards the silent action. That was very generous of them. The 3 pairs went for around $160 which I think is the proper price point for them. I am going to review them and can safely say that these should MSRP for $199 and not $399. The presentation when you unseal the box, which is beautiful upon opening. Two quality carrying cases, wire management, and tips that can make every user happy (I believe there art close to 20 different ones. I prefer the mini tri-flanges, they are sort of like the baby blues (now gray) offered by Etymotic. Also a nice mini to 1/4" adapter. I wish that I can help Monster with their PR, because I've found that their representatives know very little about audio. First of all, John, the representative was displaying multiple pairs at the meet with little or no time on them, and we all know that is a Bozo no-no. They are dynamic driver-based headphones and they need at least 100 hours on them before showing them off at meets, where tenured audiophiles are going to be critiquing them. Second of all, with the invasion of so many good Chinese headphones flooding the market, they need a lower selling price. But, like Bose, they will sell because of their name to unsuspecting non-audiophiles due to their glitz and company name. But when push comes to shove, many products like Head-Direct's line of iEM's blow these puppies away at less than half the price. For $199, they would be a viable mid-entry IEM (especially with all of the amenities). The cord is too short and the sound is a bit hollow. Monster makes some great lower to mid priced IC's, speaker wire and HDMI cables for the brick and mortars and are trying to break into a higher quality market, but they have a ways to go, yet I give them an E for effort, for the amenities, but in the end, sound is all that matters. Maybe after 200 hours, my opinion will change. |
Originally Posted by dabulls3 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm guessing you're an audiophile. I think because of your poor experience with the representative, your mentality is somewhere else and that's in disfavor of Monster. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you said you bought them at $160? I would think you would think that price as the one. I'm speaking out of the mind now, so what I'm saying might be confusing... |
Originally Posted by dabulls3 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm guessing you're an audiophile. I think because of your poor experience with the representative, your mentality is somewhere else and that's in disfavor of Monster. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you said you bought them at $160? |
Originally Posted by 3DCadman /img/forum/go_quote.gif I find they sound MUCH better than the Shure SE530 I owned. The Shures's treble was not there for me, and they sounded "honky". To me these are much more coherent. The highs are perfect, and the bass is nice. I can't imagine what the Golds would sound like. These have bass that is full, the Golds must be like car subwoofer rattle all the rearview mirrors in the cars around you bass. And I have less than 3 hours on them. |
Originally Posted by immtbiker /img/forum/go_quote.gif The Golds are a step down from the Coppers, not a step up. Also, in my opinion, the 530's are 5 leagues above the coppers. Everyone heats differently. |