
Sonic bliss....
Hello all! I thought I would attempt to write a brief review of the Cypher Labs C6iem Balanced Armature Earphones. I have always appreciated reading impressions about headphones that I am curious about so I hope that this will do just that for someone else.
Source Chain/Components: Mac Mini>16/44.1- 24/192 tracks>Audirvana+>Schiit Wyrd USB Decrapifier>Meridian Explorer v.1>Cypher Labs AlgoRythm Picollo Headphone Amplifier (set to low gain)> Cypher Labs C6iem Balanced Armature Earphones.
Songs used:
-Yiruma –“Kiss The Rain” (String Version) (16/44.1)
-CC Coletti - “You Shook Me” (24/192 Binaural Recording)
-Wycliffe Gordon-“St. Louis Blues” (24/192 Binaural Recording)
-Norah Jones- “I’ve Got To See You Again” (24/192)
-James Blake- “Retrograde” (16/44.1)
-Andrew Rayel & Armin Van Buuren- “Eiforya” (16/44.1)
Lows- The sub-bass and mid-bass leaves plenty of room for one another. They are both articulate, weighted, posses amazing slam (when called for), and are never bloated. This iem is tilted towards sounding dark but in no way veiled. They are not u shaped to my ears being that the lows align with the mids quite well. Rather, the highs are not neutral lending towards a tilted sound signature.
Mids- WOW!!! The mids ,as far as vocals are concerned, are spot on. They are not necessarily warm but natural. The mids to my ears are detailed, intimate (without sacrificing any spatial details), and are just plain clear.
Highs- Here is where I must say that this iem is lacking but not failing. The highs have a presence that has to be sought out. I say this because the highs are not airy and with some recordings sound a tad distant to my ears. They are detailed, clear, are never strident/sibilant/screechy, and still have a beautiful shimmer to them that never offends you.
I do feel that this IEM has a dark sound signature but in a seductive way, even euphonic. My listening sessions have never been interrupted due to ear fatigue with this iem. It is not euphonic in nature by way of sounding too liquid or lush though. This iem does not mask details in achieving said sound signature. In fact I am still amazed at how acoustic/wooden instruments and the piano sound with these. You can hear the pianists’ foot as it maneuvers the peddles of the piano or a violinist take calculated breaths during a solo. So yes, the C6 can convey detail but not at the volume/level of the mids and lows. The C6 has really good PRaT and is speedy while displaying space with a black background. It is never sibilant unless it is given a poor source recording. The C6 conveys a wide and tall soundstage to my ears but isn’t so much holographic as I might want it to be due to the tamed highs. It also provides a lot of depth into a recording and can sound very intimate but not rounded.
In comparison to the Cardas EM5813 I feel that the C6 is the winner hands down. I feel that the EM5813 does not have the PRaT of the C6. Although the Em5813 has a wide soundstage it is more rounded in comparison. The C6 is more clear and effortless in detail retrieval. The EM5813 can sound congested with some busy tracks and this, I feel, is due to the lack of treble presentation as the highs are severely veiled. The one focus the Em5813 excels over the c6 is in the mids. To my ears the EM5813 are ever so slightly more natural next to the c6. This can be due to the fact the Em5813 has a single dynamic driver taking on every analog signal as opposed to the 3 balanced armature with a passive crossover configuration in the C6.
Until next time Happy Listening!!