mike1127
Member of the Trade: Brilliant Zen Audio
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2005
- Posts
- 1,115
- Likes
- 25
x
If you have a good memory for sound, then the reference might be a memory image of an instrument compared with the electronic instrument producing the music you're listening to. So, I know what an orchestra or whatever sounds like, and I compare that what the speakers or headphones are trying to represent. They're very expressive, some of them, and a crappy set of cables can muddy up sound very easily -- squeeky highs and lumpy lows. People used to buy these thick stretched chunks of copper wrapped in cloth to get the image to their speakers -- using the cables as tone controls, even though they eschewed tone controls with their pure pre-amps. All that changed with linear crystal wire and oxygen free wire. Now you can hear the crap quality of the electronics themselves and the hype recording engineering in its pure form. Of course, there's also the joy of listening to LP's, with their out of true centering and warp and RIAA fantasy of how to make a cheaper and continuous performance sound with turntable technology. Any pitch true listener will tell you how much of a relief the CD was compared to the pitch variation from warping, and ear-burn fatigue at the end of the LP.
So, really, listening is just listening -- just listen to sound -- that's what the composers did: they turned sound into melody and harmony and made music out of it. We ought to be able to at least try to hear what they heard, not some mellow sludge to make us feel so sludgy and mellow about, what...? crosby, stills and nash?? -- people do listen to that stuff and think they're listening to performers and not electrical outlets with attitude.