Is it the SL-S231C or the SL-SX231C? Panasonic reuses the numbers sometimes. My 1995? S270 is my all-time favorite portable for sound, but the 2000? SX270 was terrible - I didn't like its sound, and for the first time in my life preferred MD and MP3 over a PCDP.
Generally speaking, the SX ones* aren't as impressive as the older S models, and they're going to look and feel cheap.
If we're talking about the SX series, the odds are you can do much better than that.
* not including the hi-end SX400/500 and 410/510 of course. Well I didn't like my SX510 either... the CT570 was more natural.
Originally Posted by leon Is it the SL-S231C or the SL-SX231C? Panasonic reuses the numbers sometimes. My 1995? S270 is my all-time favorite portable for sound, but the 2000? SX270 was terrible - I didn't like its sound, and for the first time in my life preferred MD and MP3 over a PCDP.
Generally speaking, the SX ones* aren't as impressive as the older S models, and they're going to look and feel cheap.
If we're talking about the SX series, the odds are you can do much better than that.
* not including the hi-end SX400/500 and 410/510 of course. Well I didn't like my SX510 either... the CT570 was more natural.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.