Quote:
In my opinion, fairly flat neutral speakers can be had relatively inexpensively in the way of studio monitor type designs. ... In my opinion, if you had $3000 to spend total, spending over $2000 on the source and less than $1000 on these type of studio monitors would sound much better than deciding to stick with an older CD player or buying one of the ~$300-500 cd players that a LOT of people here at HeadFi own and pairing them with $2000+ speakers. |
Unfortunately, I haven't had too much experience with studio monitors, so I can't comment on them. But with hi-fi speakers, it seems like $2000 definitely buys you considerably more than $1000 in speakers.
So how about a $1000 source and $2000 speakers? I think that there are some really excellent $1000 digital sources out there. Would you really rather have $1000 in speakers coupled to a $2000 source than vice-versa?
I guess it comes down to where you think the point of diminishing returns is for speakers vs. sources. I think digital sources hit that point very fast. I find it hard to believe that, given a $1000 source and a $1000 speaker system, that you would rather spend $1000 more on source than on speakers.
Quote:
Is it? Before that the MSB Link DAC came out and people said that it was a giant killer. Now the ART comes out and it's even cheaper, and people love it. Some have compared it to DACs that cost thousands of dollars. Admittedly, some of it is likely hype but I think that the fact is that the $4000 digital sources really are not that much better than the $400 digital sources (when comparing the best of each price class). $4000 speakers, on the other hand, are really much much better than $400 speakers.
In my experience, when you improve a digital source, you get a smoother sound, perhaps more dynamic, perhaps a bit more detailed. When you improve speakers, the improvements (or perhaps just changes) are much more powerful.
Of course I admit that there is a point when you can't make a noticeable improvement in speakers without spending much more, and then any extra upgrade money should go to the source, among other things. And of course system synergy should also always be looked after -- which may mean spending more for a source that complements your speakers. In general, though, it seems that better speakers are the place where you get the most for your money.
Quote:
Yeah, bad speakers can mask a good source. But if you don't at least start with a good source, then following it with good amps, wires, and speakers is just a waste (pending a source upgrade). |
Yes, but with digital sources, how much money gets you a "good source"? I think the answer is: relatively little money.