troymadison
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Posts
- 1,642
- Likes
- 27
I don't think the K1000s are bass monsters.
Originally Posted by tev /img/forum/go_quote.gif BOT.... I love the K1000s, but like smeggy, have noticed a roll-off, somewhere around 30 hz. I say this in comparison to other phones that I'm familiar with. ie. the D5000, GS1000, DX1000 and HD650 which all offer bigger foundations to the sound (I have never heard the Ed. 9's, but long to experience its already legendary authority). As a point of reference, I've only heard the K's with powerful 300b amps, recables, beefy power cords, etc. The K1000's are not really about bass. They do it with respectable conviction, but its really their other attributes that place them in the major leauges - transparency, air, speed, midrange clarity, and a wonderful flat response from 30 hz up. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp11801 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
What instrument are you listening to that produces sound in an average recording that goes below 30hz??
Your right, not many. But I hate to miss those low notes when they do occur. I listen to a lot of Choral music with pipe organ and attend a lot of live performances of the same. For this genre, the K1000's unmistakably roll off those "count the cycle" notes. I can hear the sub 30 hz notes and those between 30hz and 50hz with more conviction on other, bassier phones.
But I love the K1000's. For acoustic piano, nothing that I have heard from a dynamic phone seems to offer a flatter frequency response for most of the keyboard. As a pianist, this instrument is my acid test for flatness. Just my personal observation.
Originally Posted by Patrick82 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I have found that the more revealing you make the system the more it shows the rolled off frequency extremes of K1000. You need to tone down the midrange to compensate that, or get normal headphones with pads, however, pads blur the midrange details... I got the most bass from K1000 with a PS Audio P300 Power Plant using the MWave4 setting because it toned down the midrange and highs. I got the same sound signature when I used it for different sources, amps and transports. With MWave1, MWave2, MWave3 and Sinewave the bass sounded rolled off and it was bright. With MWave4 the mids were a little slow and blurry but there was loads more bass information! Since MWave4 and Valhalla power cord had opposite sound signatures, I couldn't listen to K1000 without MWave4. I drew some pictures to illustrate how it sounds like. |
Originally Posted by oicdn /img/forum/go_quote.gif What's funny is people say this and that are rolled off. the only experience I have intimately with stats is my SR003 and IMO, although it's "rolled off", I think it's what lends to it smoothness. "People say the SE530's are hugely rolled off, but for some reason, it's our highest selling IEM*". Rolled off doesn't mean crap to me unless it's something that's immense. Like, a note that's completely missing and is blatantly obvious. *I know that's a fact, because that's what Headroom said me over the phone when I was asking about the SRM-001mk2 and it's sound being reputably "rolled off". |
Originally Posted by oicdn /img/forum/go_quote.gif I know, but I was referring to the way people say "rolled off is bad" yada yada, yet, the really reputed rolled off IEM is the best seller. |
Originally Posted by upstateguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif NSESB USG d-_-b |