Cheap Audio Technica - too good to be true?

Aug 17, 2006 at 7:51 PM Post #16 of 22
1. you'd be pretty bad at making fakes if you didn't make packaging that looked semi-convincing too. Most of the definite fakes I've seen people show on this forum were in packaging that was only subtly different than the original. Usually they put more effort into the package than into the fake item, because it's easier and because that's what sells;

2. OEM just means that the manufacturer is a different company than the brand selling the item, which is now true for almost all electronic goods, period. The question is whether the OEM is also the designer. There are now three possibilites in product design:

a. in-house design, in-house production
b. in-house design, external production (in China, say)
c. rebranding of an item designed and produced by a non-credited company (e.g., "Sennheiser" CX300, "Creative" EP-630)
d. independent design firm, in- or out-of-house production.

Of these, d. has become the biggest likelihood for a lot of consumer products. I happen to teach at a design school and my girlfriend is a product designer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. What we're looking at with Audio-Technica headphones is likely either b. or d. In either of these cases, it seems likely that the OEM stuff is exactly what it claims to be.

Now, here's the danger: a lot of out-of-house production facilities, especially those in China and SE Asia, have their own engineering and design departments, and are perfectly happy to work for Sony one shift, JVC the next, and then spend all night coughing up fake Sony's to a ****** cut-rate design on behalf of a third party.

If authentic OEM stuff is for sale, it is because there was a loophole in the contract with the brand company that allowed the producer to sell seconds or extras-- obviously without warranties and so forth. This usually happens in the situation I describe as c. above, i.e., when the OEM company made the design themselves, they can tell Senn or Creative to go screw themselves and sell extras if they want-- they just can't use the brand name. That's why they say what they are, OEM. When they don't mention this, there's a chance you're into the territory of fakes, as I mentioned in the paragraph above.

My personal rule is, if they say OEM, it's probably true, otherwise if it seems too good to be true, it probaby is. I hope all this is useful to some of you guys, and anyone in production feel free to let us in on the inside story,

Erik
 
Aug 17, 2006 at 9:10 PM Post #17 of 22
I never understood why headphones were OEMs. Its more than a bit of luck, I've seen loads of cheaper CM7s on eBay.

Don't think OEMs are a bad thing. A hell of a lot of computer equipment is OEM, my DVD Optical drive was, thats why it was exceptionally cheap. My
PC thinks it a Pioneer drive and it burns at 16X. Apart from a sticker, it is the same as the drive I could get from PC World for £20 more.

Thats my point, an Optical drive is 99.999% functional. Headphones have a high part of their appeal in build and looks.
 
Aug 18, 2006 at 2:14 AM Post #18 of 22
Like people said before:
The eBay ones are most likely OEM's.
OEM's were used for Samsung, which had the same drivers as the real EC7's.


So in other words, these are presumed to have the same drivers as the real ones.

I want to try these; they look stylish and may sound great for the price.
 
Aug 18, 2006 at 10:41 AM Post #19 of 22
Quote:

Originally Posted by facelvega
(...) There are now three possibilites in product design:

a. (...)
b. (...)
c. (...)
d. (...)



No to make fun of your interesting post, but for some reason I just couldn't help thinking "Noboby exspects the Spanish Inquisition"...
wink.gif


Grinnings from Hannover!

Manfred / lini
 
Aug 18, 2006 at 11:39 AM Post #20 of 22
Quote:

Originally Posted by lini
No to make fun of your interesting post, but for some reason I just couldn't help thinking "Noboby exspects the Spanish Inquisition"...
wink.gif


Grinnings from Hannover!

Manfred / lini



Yeah, you can really tell that

a. I teach this stuff;
b. I'm getting fed up with people who trust brand logos more than their ears;
c. I need to to relax and have a beer.

on it!

ps, Hey Lini, I once bought an AKG K400 I saw on ebay strictly on virtue of some kind comments you made about them in some very old posts. I've been very happy with them-- one notch under K501 for resolution, but no bass problem, and they were cheap to boot! Many thanks for posting all that stuff so long ago,
FV
 
Aug 18, 2006 at 4:40 PM Post #22 of 22
Quote:

Originally Posted by facelvega
ps, Hey Lini, I once bought an AKG K400 I saw on ebay strictly on virtue of some kind comments you made about them in some very old posts. I've been very happy with them-- one notch under K501 for resolution, but no bass problem, and they were cheap to boot! Many thanks for posting all that stuff so long ago,
FV



Oh, thanks & you're welcome! And yes, the K400 really is a nice phone - and I'd also claim it to be the best looking of the K400/500/401/501/601/701 bunch.

Greetings from Hannover!

Manfred / lini
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top