[Audio-Me]

Which do you think sounds better, ADD, or AAD? Don't say anything that starts with D.

 

[shivohum]

It's really irrelevant. Some ADD records sound better than some AAD records, and vice-versa, and some DDD records sound better than some records of the other type

. Some DDD records sound really quite excellent, actually.

 

[redshifter]

i think the real question is, if digital is so great, why do so many bands record in analog? *grabs popcorn*

 

[Dusty Chalk]

I agree with shivohum. Anything can be done well or badly.

But I have to admit, I heard a DAD recording once, and it was pretty bad (ABC - _How to be a Millionaire_), but I think that one was on purpose cheesy bad.

rs - because they don't need to learn a whole new system? That's one of the biggest criticisms by people in the field. Digital recordings from 15 years ago can't find the corresponding equipment to be played on anymore, whereas analog recordings from over 50 years ago can still find their associated equipment.

 

[jbannow]

Quote:

Originally posted by redshifter *grabs popcorn*

This had me falling on the floor laughing last night. My fiance thought I had flipped out.

I dare not comment on the actual question at hand though.

- Jeff