CD recording and production
Mar 26, 2002 at 8:00 PM Post #2 of 5

shivohum

Keeper of the Quotes
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Posts
903
Likes
11
It's really irrelevant. Some ADD records sound better than some AAD records, and vice-versa, and some DDD records sound better than some records of the other type
smily_headphones1.gif
. Some DDD records sound really quite excellent, actually.
 
Mar 26, 2002 at 8:40 PM Post #3 of 5

redshifter

High Fidelity Gentility• redrum....I mean redshifter• Pee-pee. Hoo-hoo.• I ♥ Garfield
Joined
Aug 12, 2001
Posts
10,217
Likes
18
i think the real question is, if digital is so great, why do so many bands record in analog? *grabs popcorn*
 
Mar 27, 2002 at 4:48 AM Post #4 of 5

Dusty Chalk

Head-Fi-holic: With headphones would just be a benny.
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
6,565
Likes
15
I agree with shivohum. Anything can be done well or badly.

But I have to admit, I heard a DAD recording once, and it was pretty bad (ABC - _How to be a Millionaire_), but I think that one was on purpose cheesy bad.

rs - because they don't need to learn a whole new system? That's one of the biggest criticisms by people in the field. Digital recordings from 15 years ago can't find the corresponding equipment to be played on anymore, whereas analog recordings from over 50 years ago can still find their associated equipment.
 
Mar 27, 2002 at 8:30 PM Post #5 of 5

jbannow

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 19, 2002
Posts
218
Likes
10
Quote:

Originally posted by redshifter
*grabs popcorn*


This had me falling on the floor laughing last night. My fiance thought I had flipped out.

I dare not comment on the actual question at hand though.
biggrin.gif


- Jeff
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top