atomicbob
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 27, 2012
- Posts
- 986
- Likes
- 1,036
Liquid Carbon Technical Measurements Balanced inputs and outputs
The data presented were collected as follows:
1. PrismSound dScope III, picoscope 5243B
2. 300 and 30 ohm loads used for measurements
3. Balanced cables Canare L-4E6S starquad with Neutrik XLR connectors
4. Unbalanced cables DH Labs Silver Sonic Air Matrix RCA (for picoscope)
5. Vaunix Lab Brick USB hub
6. 0 dB gain @ 0.775 Vrms 0 dBu except as noted for square wave measurements
7. Liquid Carbon gain switch set to High
0.775 Vrms @ 30 ohms is 20 mW producing 102 dB SPL in HE-500 with sensitivity of 89 dB/mW
0.775 Vrms @ 300 ohms is 2 mW producing 105 dB SPL in HD650 with sensitivity of 102 dB/mW
Picture of the Audio Lab setup for Liquid Carbon
Liquid Carbon square wave 20 Hz 2 Vpp 10 mS / div 300R load
Liquid Carbon square wave 20 Hz 2 Vpp 10 uS / div 300R load
Liquid Carbon amplitude - phase - gain (A01) 300R load
Liquid Carbon signal to noise (A07) 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N THD nth harmonic distortion (A04) 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk (A08 A09) 300 ohm load
editorial - I believe there is a tendency to focus too much on numbers such as THD rather than look at distortion spectrum and type such as even vs odd in an attempt to reduce a complex topic to a single number representing a sort of goodness rating.
Here are graphs for the various measurements
Liquid Carbon Frequency Response and Interchannel Phase 1/2 300R load
Liquid Carbon Frequency Response and Interchannel Phase 2/2 300R load
Liquid Carbon Gain vs Amplitude Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon Gain vs Amplitude Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Frequency Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Frequency Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Amplitude Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Amplitude Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk Left to Right vs Frequency 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk Right to Left vs Frequency 300R load
Liquid Carbon 50 Hz + 7000 Hz spectrum Left and Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon 600 Hz + 1700 Hz spectrum Left and Right 300R load
The data presented were collected as follows:
1. PrismSound dScope III, picoscope 5243B
2. 300 and 30 ohm loads used for measurements
3. Balanced cables Canare L-4E6S starquad with Neutrik XLR connectors
4. Unbalanced cables DH Labs Silver Sonic Air Matrix RCA (for picoscope)
5. Vaunix Lab Brick USB hub
6. 0 dB gain @ 0.775 Vrms 0 dBu except as noted for square wave measurements
7. Liquid Carbon gain switch set to High
0.775 Vrms @ 30 ohms is 20 mW producing 102 dB SPL in HE-500 with sensitivity of 89 dB/mW
0.775 Vrms @ 300 ohms is 2 mW producing 105 dB SPL in HD650 with sensitivity of 102 dB/mW
Picture of the Audio Lab setup for Liquid Carbon
Liquid Carbon square wave 20 Hz 2 Vpp 10 mS / div 300R load
Liquid Carbon square wave 20 Hz 2 Vpp 10 uS / div 300R load
Liquid Carbon amplitude - phase - gain (A01) 300R load
Liquid Carbon signal to noise (A07) 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N THD nth harmonic distortion (A04) 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk (A08 A09) 300 ohm load
editorial - I believe there is a tendency to focus too much on numbers such as THD rather than look at distortion spectrum and type such as even vs odd in an attempt to reduce a complex topic to a single number representing a sort of goodness rating.
Here are graphs for the various measurements
Liquid Carbon Frequency Response and Interchannel Phase 1/2 300R load
Liquid Carbon Frequency Response and Interchannel Phase 2/2 300R load
Liquid Carbon Gain vs Amplitude Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon Gain vs Amplitude Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Frequency Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Frequency Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Amplitude Left 300R load
Liquid Carbon THD+N vs Amplitude Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk Left to Right vs Frequency 300R load
Liquid Carbon Crosstalk Right to Left vs Frequency 300R load
Liquid Carbon 50 Hz + 7000 Hz spectrum Left and Right 300R load
Liquid Carbon 600 Hz + 1700 Hz spectrum Left and Right 300R load