aspenx
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2010
- Posts
- 333
- Likes
- 14
I am modifying a clone of the Lehmann BCL and am thinking of upgrading the decoupling capacitors going to the OPA which I have rolled from a OPA2134 to LT1364.
The original capacitors are Elna RE3 470uF 35V bypassed with a ERO MKC1860 0.022uF 400V. The headamp sounds great all-round except for the mutant trebles that seem somewhat too incoherent with the rest of the sound. I figured this has got to do with the supplies to the OPA and read up on stumbled upon the idea of cascade bypassing.
The question is, I only have enough space on the board for 2 capacitors for each rail. I read on diyaudio that "bypassing a capacitor locally/directly on its terminals is not good and should be avoided". Is this true? If so, how should I go about it and should I even be considering cascade bypassing in the first place and why?
The original capacitors are Elna RE3 470uF 35V bypassed with a ERO MKC1860 0.022uF 400V. The headamp sounds great all-round except for the mutant trebles that seem somewhat too incoherent with the rest of the sound. I figured this has got to do with the supplies to the OPA and read up on stumbled upon the idea of cascade bypassing.
The question is, I only have enough space on the board for 2 capacitors for each rail. I read on diyaudio that "bypassing a capacitor locally/directly on its terminals is not good and should be avoided". Is this true? If so, how should I go about it and should I even be considering cascade bypassing in the first place and why?