Quote:
So I guess my definition and idea of reference is uncolored neutral transparent sound...
As i understand tube amps can create "warmth" and "sonic character" as advertised and suggested in many many cases...
In my opinion this suggests the sound is likely colored or less neutral than preferred for my specific needs.
So i guess my questions remains in that: are there tube amps that can potentially keep a very neutral character, or is solid state the only way to go, and furthermore what balanced amps are suggested to meet the aforementioned criteria then.
-Thanks again
That's how all sane people define it ..
No, tube-amps are NOT 'reference' . And 'reference' DOES have a meaning, but people here won't like what it is :
It's about OBJECTIVE,MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE .
They ALL have major drawbacks, compared to properly designed solid-state amps .
It's fine that you are interested in tubes and all, and it
is possible to make a 'well-sounding' tube-amp,
but don't kid yourselves : There are
very good reasons why tube-amps are
not used for monitoring purposes in recording-studios !
(OK, you might be able to find a few 'all-analog' studios where they still think 68dB dynamic range is better than 98 ..)
In studios, tubes are typically used when you want coloration, ie during recording .
Tubes may be new to you, but it's an OLD technology and saying that tubes are better than solid-state is somehow like claiming a steam-engine is better than a jet-engine .
Quote:
..but because tube amps are usually much better at sound stage and holographic imaging than solid state amps are.
No, they really aren't .
You try go sell a tube power-amp to a recording-engineer using that 'argument' .
I'd say forget about tube-amps, they do NOT sound better, but cost
a lot more !