Quote:
Well, I would like to tell you my sound preferences but I really don't have a clue ^^ I would love to just see a list of IN-earphones which cost about 50€ and are recommendet at this time. Thanks
But the problem is we can't just give recommendations out blindly, or simply give arbitrary lists of stuff that's "highly regarded". Recommendations only remain helpful when one can tailor them to the others preferences. I HIGHLY recommend that you re-read the previous post again.
Quote:
You know. The Shure 425s were my first choice, but I cannot afford it.
How's the bass on the RE272 and PFE122 vs the GR07 MKII? I've thought about the ER4P also because of the mic. That would be useful, but not important. The HF5/Shure 425 were reccomended to me by "headphone.com". I'm sure (according to Head-Fi) that everything would be a step up from my previous headphones, Bose IEM. They had that initial "wow" factor, but as I listened to my music, I noticed it was lacking in the deep end of the bass. Then I noticed they didn't pair well with my kind of music. Any details on the headphones you reccomend would be great. When suggesting headphone please keep in mind that I love electronic music above all else. Rock/Metal/Score are next in line. Thabks TwinQy!
The ER4Ps have a mic?
You sure you're not confusing them with the HF3 instead?
RE272s - very soft note presentation but very decent extension and a nicely rounded impact along with oodles of texture.
PFE122 - also soft, not as rounded or slow-decaying of note (could be a good thing or a bad thing), more focused about the punch than anything else really.
GR07 - Loads of texturing and very dynamic, great technicalities - makes drums pop out in an extremely vivid way.
Though it is a bit confusing, in terms of how you want an analytical sig but lean more towards aggressive genres - any way in particular that you might enjoy your genres presented? Because at this point I guess the best compromise would be the GR07s, as they retain balance and an emphasis towards both dynamic "fun" and the other end of the spectrum (although analytical sigs can be quite fun, at least for me)
Quote:
Hmmm, sounds like a tough choice between the two. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the CKM99 being my reference point. Are you saying the CKM99 are better than both CKS99 & CKN70? Are the CKS99 worse than the CKM99? Thanks for your input.
Reference point in terms of sound signature is what I had meant, in terms of comparing between the two I tried to make it more relative against the K99s.
Quote:
What's the worthy upgrade for my mh1c? My budget is around $100. I really like the sq of the mh1c, but I need more bass and better isolation.
More bass than the MH1C? The EPH100s have ample more midbass and midrange emphasis from the smoother and more laid-back treble keeping things in perspective. The nozzles are also quite large so if they do happen to fit, you'd get insane amounts of isolation, almost Ety-levels.